Adoption of Transformative Technology such as CDSS in Clinical Settings
===
Computerized clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are software applications that provide tailored information or recommendations to clinicians at the point of care, based on patient data and clinical knowledge . CDSS can improve healthcare quality and safety by enhancing medical decisions, promoting evidence-based practices, reducing medical errors, and optimizing drug prescription and therapy . However, implementing CDSS in clinical settings is not a straightforward process, as it involves multiple challenges and barriers that need to be addressed. This blog post aims to provide an overview of the benefits, challenges, and strategies for successful adoption of CDSS in clinical settings.
Benefits of CDSS
—
CDSS can offer various benefits for clinicians, patients, and healthcare organizations. Some of the potential benefits are:
– Improved clinical outcomes: CDSS can help clinicians diagnose, treat, and manage various conditions, such as chronic diseases, infections, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases . CDSS can also provide early warning scores and risk stratification tools to identify patients who are at high risk of adverse events or deterioration .
– Increased adherence to guidelines: CDSS can provide reminders, alerts, and suggestions based on the latest evidence-based guidelines and protocols, which can help clinicians follow best practices and avoid unnecessary or inappropriate interventions .
– Reduced medication errors: CDSS can assist clinicians in prescribing, dispensing, and administering medications, by checking for drug-drug interactions, allergies, contraindications, dosages, and formularies . CDSS can also monitor patients’ responses to medications and alert clinicians to potential adverse drug reactions or non-adherence .
– Enhanced efficiency and productivity: CDSS can streamline workflows and reduce administrative tasks for clinicians, by automating data entry, documentation, ordering, reporting, and billing . CDSS can also facilitate communication and coordination among different healthcare providers and settings .
– Increased patient satisfaction and engagement: CDSS can empower patients to participate in their own care, by providing them with educational materials, feedback, reminders, and self-management tools . CDSS can also improve patient satisfaction by reducing waiting times, improving access to information, and enhancing the quality of care .
Challenges of CDSS
—
Despite the potential benefits of CDSS, their adoption in clinical settings is often hindered by various challenges and barriers. Some of the common challenges are:
– Technical issues: CDSS depend on reliable hardware, software, network, and data infrastructure to function properly. Technical issues such as system crashes, bugs, errors, delays, or incompatibility can compromise the performance and usability of CDSS .
– Data quality: CDSS rely on accurate, complete, timely, and standardized data to provide relevant and valid information or recommendations. Data quality issues such as missing, outdated, inconsistent, or erroneous data can affect the reliability and validity of CDSS output .
– User acceptance: CDSS require users to trust and accept the information or recommendations provided by the system. User acceptance issues such as lack of awareness,
“`
knowledge, skills, motivation, or confidence can affect the adoption and use of CDSS . Users may also have concerns about the impact of CDSS on their autonomy,
professionalism, liability, or workflow .
– Organizational factors: CDSS require organizational support and resources to be implemented and sustained in clinical settings. Organizational factors such as lack of leadership,
vision, strategy, culture, incentives, or evaluation can affect the adoption and integration of CDSS .
Strategies for Successful Adoption of CDSS
—
To overcome the challenges and barriers of CDSS adoption in clinical settings,
various strategies have been proposed and implemented. Some of the effective strategies are:
– User-centered design: CDSS should be designed with the involvement of end-users,
such as clinicians and patients. User-centered design can help ensure that CDSS meet
the needs, preferences, expectations, and contexts of users. User-centered design can also
enhance the usability,
functionality,
and aesthetics
of CDSS .
– Evidence-based development: CDSS should be developed based on sound scientific evidence
and best practices. Evidence-based development can help ensure that CDSS provide valid,
reliable,
and up-to-date information or recommendations. Evidence-based development can also
enhance the credibility,
trustworthiness,
and effectiveness
of CDSS .
– Implementation science: CDSS should be implemented using a systematic and rigorous approach
that considers the complexity and dynamics of clinical settings. Implementation science can help
identify and address the barriers and facilitators of CDSS adoption, and evaluate the outcomes and impacts of CDSS. Implementation science can also enhance the scalability,
sustainability,
and generalizability
of CDSS .
Conclusion
—
CDSS are transformative technologies that can improve healthcare delivery by enhancing medical decisions with targeted clinical knowledge, patient information, and other health information. However, adopting CDSS in clinical settings is not a simple task, as it involves multiple challenges and barriers that need to be overcome. By applying user-centered design, evidence-based development, and implementation science, CDSS can be successfully adopted and integrated in clinical settings, and deliver their potential benefits for clinicians, patients, and healthcare organizations.
Bibliography
—
: An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3:17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y
: Clinical decision support systems to improve drug prescription and therapy optimisation in clinical practice: a scoping review. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023;30(1):e100683. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100683
: Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023;30(6):1205–1217. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw160
: Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci. 2018;6:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-92
: Clinical decision support systems for early detection of sepsis in hospitalised patients: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11):e032507. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032507
: The impact of computerized clinical decision support systems on guideline adherence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019;25(5):775–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13205
: The effect of computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support on medication errors in the long-term care setting: a systematic review of quantitative evidence. Inform Health Soc Care.
2018;43(4):439–457.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2017.1364249
: The impact of computerized provider order entry with integrated clinical decision support on pharmacist–physician communication: a qualitative analysis of prescribers’ perspectives.
J Am Med Inform Assoc.
2018;25(12):1632–1640.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy121
: The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review.
J Am Med Inform Assoc.
2005;12(5):505–516.
https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1700
: The impact of health information technology on coordination of care.
Int J Med Inform.
2020;136:104078.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104078
: Patient engagement with computerised therapy software: a qualitative analysis of experiences using a novel attention training app.
BMJ Open.
2019;9(12):e033574.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033574
: The impact of health information technology on patient satisfaction.
Health Policy Technol.
2018;7(4):411–417.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2018.09.001
: Technical challenges in implementing computerized clinical decision support systems for antimicrobial stewardship in hospitals: a scoping review.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control.
2020;9(1):191.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00851-x
: Data quality issues in electronic health records: an adaptation framework for the Egyptian context.
Perspect Health Inf Manag.
2018;15(Fall):1f.
: User acceptance factors of hospital information systems and electronic medical records: a systematic review.
J Med Syst.
2018;42(5):
