Academic Writing Services - Dissertation & Research Essay Writers | 10-20% OFF Discounts NURS 6050: Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health

Agenda Comparison Grid And Fact Sheet Or Talking Points Brief – Sample

Nursing homeact aid
Agenda Comparison Grid And Circumstance Equivocation Or Talking Points Shabby
It may look to you that soundnesspains has been a social question of deliberate natant gregarious leaders coercion as hanker as you can bear-in-mind.

Healthpains has been a management item and a question of deliberate referable attributable attributable attributable singly in modern intervals yet as distant end as the administration of the relieve U.S. moderator, John Adams. In 1798, Adams authorized comp requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be firm privately coercion envelope their medical bills. This represented the coercionemost greater interest of U.S. soundnesspains comp, and the question of soundnesspains has been woven into moderatorial agendas and gregarious deliberate constantly past.

As a soundnesspains negotiative, you may be named upon to afford expertise, control and/or opinions on soundnesspains matters as they are deliberated coercion inclusion into oddlightlight management. You may also be complicated in planning oddlightlight organizational management and apologys to modifys in comp. Coercion perfect of these reasons you should be handy to converse to social soundnesspains quenchedcomes making the oddlights.

In this Assignment, you accomplish irritate modern moderatorial soundnesspains agendas. You also accomplish plan a circumstance equivocation to adjoin the interest of a soundnesspains quenchedcome and the impression on this quenchedcome of modern or proposed management.

To Plan:

Review the agenda priorities of the general/sitting U.S. moderator and the brace anterior moderatorial administrations.
Select an quenchedcome cognate to soundnesspains that was discourseed by each of the terminal three U.S. moderatorial administrations.
Reflect on the centre of their appertaining agendas, including the perfectocation of financial media coercion discourseing the soundnesspains quenchedcome you clarified.
Consider how you would adjoin the interest of a soundnesspains quenchedcome to a legislator/policymanufacturer or a constituent of their staff coercion inclusion on an agenda.
The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Agenda Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page Circumstance Equivocation)

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid

Conservation the Agenda Comparison Grid Template plant in the Learning Media and full the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid inveterate on the general/sitting U.S. moderator and the brace anterior moderatorial administrations and their agendas cognate to the generally-known soundness interest you clarified. Be infallible to discourse the following:

Fulfill and afford a shabby cognomen of the population soundness interest you clarified and the circumstanceors that conduce to it.
Describe the professional agenda centre cognate to the quenchedcome you clarified.
Fulfill the perfectocations of financial -research tract questions clear disquisition pattern and other media that the general and brace anterior moderators absorbed to this quenchedcome.
Explain how each of the moderatorial administrations bearinged the quenchedcome.
Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis

Using the counsel you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, full the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis division of the template, by discourseing the following:

Which professional exercise would most slight be under obligation coercion subsidiary you discourse the soundnesspains quenchedcome you clarified?
How do you believe your clarified soundnesspains quenchedcome capability secure on the agenda coercion the general and brace anterior moderators? How does it cling there?
Who would you elect to be the entrepreneur/ warrior/surety of the soundnesspains quenchedcome you clarified coercion the general and brace anterior moderators?
Part 3: Circumstance Equivocation or Talking Points Shabby

Using the counsel recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, unfold a 1-page truth that you could conservation to adjoin with a managementmaker/legislator or a constituent of their staff coercion this soundnesspains quenchedcome. Be infallible to discourse the following:

Summarize why this soundnesspains quenchedcome is influential and should be intervening in the agenda coercion comp.
Justify the role of the comfort in agenda-setting coercion soundnesspains quenchedcomes.

Part 2:

Which professional exercise would most slight be under obligation coercion subsidiary you discourse the soundnesspains quenchedcome you clarified?
How do you believe your clarified soundnesspains quenchedcome capability secure on the agenda coercion the general and brace anterior moderators? How does it cling there?
Who would you elect to be the entrepreneur/ warrior/surety of the soundnesspains quenchedcome you clarified coercion the general and brace anterior moderators?
Please be biased in this exception.

Part 3: Talking Points Shabby

Unfold a 1-page Circumstance Equivocation or Talking Points Shabby that you could conservation to adjoin with a managementmaker/legislator or a constituent of their staff coercion this soundnesspains quenchedcome. You can conservation Microsoft Word or PowerPoint to compose your Circumstance Equivocation or Talking Point Shabby. Be infallible to discourse the following:

Summarize why this soundnesspains quenchedcome is influential and should be intervening in the agenda coercion comp.
Justify the role of the comfort in agenda-setting coercion soundnesspains quenchedcomes.
You want to interpret the DeMarco and Tufts (2014) article.

It must be coercionmatted with an Executive Summary, Endground and Significance, and a Position Statement.
The bullets in the syllabus are intervening in the DeMarco and Adams coercionmat. i.e. why this soundness pains quenchedcome is influential and should be intervening in the agenda coercion comp.
Justify the role of the comfort in agenda-setting coercion soundness pains quenchedcomes (this is nearest quenched of your compass).
Bear-in-mind in this exception you are talking to your legislators. Please do referable attributable attributable attributable conservation I, We, coercioneseeing.


Agenda Comparison Grid Template

Title

Foremost Name Terminal Name

Walden University

Management and Advocacy coercion Improving Population Soundness

NURS 6050

Date

Title of Tract

(Agenda Comparison Grid and Circumstance Equivocation or Talking Points Shabby Assignment)

Agenda Comparison Grid and Circumstance Equivocation or Talking Points Shabby Assignment coercion Part 1 and Part 2

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid

Fulfill the Population Soundness interest you clarified.  

Opioid contingency

Describe the Population Soundness interest you clarified and the circumstanceors that conduce to it. Deaths cognate to refuse balancedose are on the soften in America according to a 2017 soundness recital. According to CDC recitals, balance 700,000 demises occurred betwixt 1999 and 2017 (Sederer & Marino, 2018). Statistics pomp that 130 crowd decease daily due to opioids balancedose. According to the U.S. Department of Human and Soundness Services, an growth in opioid order leads to an opioid contingency (Sederer & Marino, 2018). The addictive disposition of opioids growths the abandon of the contingency.
Administration (Moderator Name) Moderator Trump Moderator Obama Moderator Bush
Describe the professional agenda centre cognate to this quenchedcome coercion the general and brace anterior moderators. In 2017, Moderator Trump professed the opioid contingency as a soundnesspains necessity. In 2018, the moderator unfolded an in named Safer Prescribing Plan to bung the order of opioids to crowd thus exposing crowd to the abandon of addiction (Ogawa, 2018). Moderator Obama prepared plans to bung the opioid contingency. The programs and ins complicated stoppage of order, monitoring the order, and matters to food the addicted crowd (Congress, 2019). Moderator George Bush arun programs to investment schools to experience living-souls to fulfill and aid crowd with opioid addiction. The investmenting was critical in unfolding nationality food programs (Ogawa, 2018).
Fulfill the perfectocations of financial and other media that the general and brace anterior moderators absorbed to this quenchedcome. In 2018, Moderator Trump authorized a $6 billion investmenting to struggle opioid contingency (White House, 2018). In 2016, Moderator Obama authorized a $1.1 billion investmenting to contention the opioid contingency (Congress, 2019). In 2000, Moderator Bush prepared plans to afford 600 pet coercion refuse testimonials to the addicts. He authorized $23 pet to schools to furnish refuse experienceing kits to husband the lives of students (White House, 2018).
Explain how each of the moderatorial administrations bearinged the quenchedcome. Moderator Trump bearinged the quenchedcome using three strategies.

Part 1. Teach the addicts and assailable crowd and convert call-control of opioids (White House, 2018).

Part 2. Carve the furnish of opioid from persomal and intersocial suppliers (White House, 2018).

Part 3. Food those with addiction through evidence-inveterate matter.

Moderator Trump prepared Safer Prescribing Plan to carve the order of opioids by a third in three years (White House, 2018).

The moderator prepared programs to teach crowd abquenched dangers of opioids and affordd matter to the addicts (White House, 2018).

Moderator Obama prepared a All Addiction and Retrieval Act 2016 (Congress, 2019).

The determination comprises six pillars including, stoppage, matter, immoral fairness reforms, retrieval, jurisprudence enforcement, and balancedose violation.

Moderator Bush prepared programs to means investments to communities to intercept addiction and afford solutions to the addicts such as foodive strategies (Christie et al., 2017).

 

 

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis

Administration (Moderator Name) Moderator Trump Moderator Obama Moderator Bush
Which professional exercise would most slight be under obligation coercion subsidiary you discourse the soundnesspains quenchedcome you clarified? The Department of Soundness and Human Services and the Substance Abconservation and Mental Soundness Services Administration (White House, 2018). The agencies are critical in expanding approximation to pains, intercept sport, and food services coercion constantlyy U.S. denizen (Ogawa, 2018). The Department of Soundness and Human Services and the Substance Abconservation and Mental Soundness Services Administration. The agencies are critical in expanding approximation to pains, intercept sport, and food services coercion constantlyy U.S. denizen (Congress, 2019). The Department of Soundness and Human Services and the Substance Abconservation and Mental Soundness Services Administration. The agencies are critical in expanding approximation to pains, intercept sport, and food services coercion constantlyy U.S. denizen (Congress, 2019).
How do you believe your clarified soundnesspains quenchedcome capability secure on the agenda coercion the general and brace anterior moderators? How does it cling there? Opioid contingency can secure into the agenda of Moderator Trump past he is coercioncible abquenched closing the borders and carveting the anticipation of the opioids (Ogawa, 2018). It accomplish be sustained through the investmenting and programs prepared by the moderator. Moderator Trump professed the opioid contingency as a soundness necessity thus trade coercion a heads-on bearing to contention the quenchedcome (Ogawa, 2018). The in would contest with Obama’s All Addiction and Retrieval Act 2016. The agenda of the moderator was to unfold a all bearing to food and encourage stakeholders in the opioid contingency (Congress, 2019). The program would secure into Moderator Bush’s agenda past it centrees on nationality food. Communities are critical in the contention across the opioid contingency. Produce of investmenting to schools would be critical in intercepting oddlightlight addicts (Ogawa, 2018).
Who would you elect to be the entrepreneur/ warrior/surety of the soundnesspains quenchedcome you clarified coercion the general and brace anterior moderators? Moderator Trump is the best surety or warrior past he was trade coercion attempts to carve down furnish chains of the refuses (White House, 2018). Moderator Obama’s all bearing makes him relieve best surety to discourse the opioid contingency (Congress, 2019). Moderator Bush’s bearing of contentioning the contingency from the grassroots including communities and schools is a warinessful bearing to adders the opioid contingency (Christie et al., 2017).

Truth with the Circumstances

The attempts made by the diverse moderators are critical in end the opioid contingency in the kingdom. Starting with coercionmer Moderator Bush who was seeking to elucidate the abandon from the grassroots to Moderator Trump was seeking to carve the furnish chains (White House, 2018). The attempt by coercionmer Moderator Obama is critical past it comprises stakeholders such as jurisprudence enforcement, stoppage, matter, immoral fairness reforms, retrieval, and balancedose violation. The attempts are critical and they can aid the kingdom to balancecome the opioid contingency. One of the attempts the moderators possess missed is to modify the comportment or apprehension of refuses (Christie et al., 2017). Moderator Obama made attempts to pomp that diverse parties were critical in perfecteviating the abandon of opioids. The opioid contingency requires a all and multi-layered bearing past other refuses such as alcohol and marijuana resemble a role in the addiction of opioids (Christie et al., 2017). It is the part of advenient empires to cunning virtue, not spurious, and sustainable bearinges to discourse the addiction of opioids.

The soundness quenchedcome is influential past it would elucidate distinct abandons to the retrogradation of abandons and demises. The discourse is critical past it would aid the management manufacturers to unfold policies that accomplish eninfallible virtue apology to the opioid contingency. A discourse with a management manufacturer would be requisite in evaluating the policies made by the coercionmer moderators and the measures wanted in the advenient.

The role of a comfort in the soundnesspains quenchedcome is to teach the patients abquenched the abandons of opioid affront. Another role is to speak the patients with virtue pains. Coercion in, speaking addiction natant the patients is critical in reducing the disclaiming property of the sickness. Comforts possess a role to eninfallible they counsellor coercion meliorate policies to convert the disclaiming property of the opioid contingency in the kingdom.

Conclusion

The opioid contingency is a greater quenchedcome great communities through demises and insufficient soundness. The contingency growths the rate of misdemeanor and insufficient act act. Three moderators including Trump, Obama, and Bush possess made attempts to balance the quenchedcome. Demises cognate to refuse balancedose are on the soften in America according to a 2017 soundness recital. According to CDC recitals, balance 700,000 demises occurred betwixt 1999 and 2017. Statistics pomp that 130 crowd decease daily due to opioids balancedose. The mighty demise is a representation of the ruefulness of the quantity. One of the influential agencies in the contention across the opioid contingency is the U.S. Department of Human and Soundness Services. The three moderators possess prepared incongruous programs to quell the contingency. The deployment of the actforce and the produce of investments is critical in eliminating the obstacles to the escalating opioid contingency. Comportment modify is another influential circumstanceor that nationality acters and empire officials should nourish to modify the mindfirm abquenched refuses. Governments should elucidate the furnish chains that imperil harmless progeny who captivate the refuses coercion the coercionemost interval and following befit certain customers.

References

Christie, C., Baker, C., Cooper, R., Kennedy, P. J., Madras, B., & Bondi, P. (2017). The moderator’s trust on struggleing refuse addiction and the opioid contingency. Washington, DC, US Empire Printing Office, Nov1.

Congress, U. S. (2019). All Addiction and Retrieval Act of 2016. In US Congress.

Corrigan, P. W., & Nieweglowski, K. (2018). Stigma and the generally-known soundness agenda coercion the opioid contingency in America. Intersocial Journal Entry of Refuse Management59, 44-49.

Ogawa, L. M. (2018). Centre: Sensory Biology and Pain: On the Opioid Contingency and the Advenient of Pain Matter: An Interview with Bertha K. Madras, PhD. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine91(1), 73.

Sederer, L. I., & Marino, L. A. (2018). End the opioid communicated by changing the refinement. Psychiatric quarterly89(4), 891-895.

White House. (2018). End America’s Opioid Contingency. White House. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/opioids/

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

Read more

Free-revision policy

The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.

Read more

Privacy policy

The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency