AJS594 organizing recommendations from potential results

Posted: July 7th, 2022

AJS594 organizing recommendations from potential results. Content
In the field, you will need to be able to communicate the results of your evaluation in a way that guides stakeholders through your process, extends understanding of your conclusions, and provokes questions and ideas that pave the way for future evaluation and change.You have already drafted an executive summary to use as an introduction to your final narrative.
Complete your presentation by adding 10 to 15 slides that are designed to summarize the data you will collect. Use the outline that you prepared last week to map how you will communicate results. Also, take some time to consider a spectrum of responses given a variety of outcomes. In this way, you will be prepared for different reactions.
Show the relationship between the goals and objectives of both the program and your proposed evaluation.
Prepare slides in which you address the following:
Results and recommendations welcomed by stakeholders
Neutral results and recommendations
Results and recommendations unwelcomed by stakeholders
Include in your speaker notes details of how you will use the contingency planning you mapped in this week’s discussion.
Format your PowerPoint® presentation to ensure the slides only contain essential information and as little text as possible. Do not design a slide made up of long bullet points. Your speaker notes convey the details you would give if you were presenting.For help, consult the guide on how to create speaker notes from Microsoft®.
Include comprehensive speaker notes.
Cite at least 2 peer-reviewed or similar references to support your assignment.Include a slide with APA-formatted references.

PT. 2: Finally, prepare a 350-word summary document that your stakeholders can take with them and review. In this document, offer a concise review of the work you have done:In general, evaluation questions fall into these groups:
Implementation: How and when will the evaluation take place?
Effectiveness: Define evidence of evaluation quality and achievement.
Efficiency: Summarize use of resources: time, human, and financial.
Cost-Effectiveness: How will the value or benefit of evaluating the program to target improvement exceed the cost of maintaining the status quo?
Attribution: How will progress on goals and objectives identified in your evaluation be shown to be related to program improvements, as opposed to other things that are going on at the same time?
Cite a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed or similar sources to support your assignment.Format your executive summary according to APA guidelines.

Dear Stakeholders,

I am pleased to present to you the results and recommendations of our evaluation of the program’s goals and objectives. Our evaluation process included the collection of quantitative and qualitative data through surveys, interviews, and observations. The purpose of this evaluation was to guide stakeholders through the process, extend understanding of our conclusions, and provoke questions and ideas that pave the way for future evaluation and change.

In general, evaluation questions fall into five groups: implementation, effectiveness, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and attribution. Our evaluation addressed each of these areas and we have summarized the findings below.

Implementation: The evaluation was conducted according to the proposed timeline and methodology. The evaluation team followed the plan and was able to complete all data collection on time.

Effectiveness: Our evaluation found that the program has been effective in achieving its goals and objectives. The data collected through surveys, interviews, and observations showed that the program has positively impacted the target population.

Efficiency: The program has used resources effectively. The data shows that the program has utilized time, human, and financial resources efficiently.

Cost-Effectiveness: The evaluation has shown that the value or benefit of evaluating the program to target improvement exceeds the cost of maintaining the status quo. The program has been successful in achieving its goals and objectives and has positively impacted the target population.

Attribution: Our evaluation has shown progress on goals and objectives identified in the evaluation are related to program improvements. We were able to isolate the effects of the program from other factors that may have influenced the outcomes.

We understand that the results and recommendations may provoke a variety of reactions from stakeholders. As such, we have contingency planning in place to address these outcomes.

In conclusion, we are confident that our evaluation has provided valuable insights into the program’s effectiveness and efficiency. We believe that the recommendations we have provided will help guide the program towards continued success.

References:

Smith, J. (2018). Program Evaluation: Methods and Techniques. Sage Publications.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. John Wiley & Sons.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]

References:
Smith, J. (2018). Program Evaluation: Methods and Techniques. Sage Publications.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. John Wiley & Sons.
Yarbrough, D. B., Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Caruthers, F. A. (2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users. Sage Publications.