Assessment grading criteria essay

Evaluation grading standards 31/10/2019 Stage 5 Evaluation grading standards COURSEWORK 2019 15:58 L5 CW 100-90% 89-80% 79-70% 69-60% 59-50% 49-40% 39-30% 29-20% 19-10% 9-Zero% Coherence, organisation of project and a focus to goal Robust logical organisation and coherence enhances fulfilment of the project targets and with some creativity. Robust logical organisation and coherence enhances fulfilment of the project targets. Demonstrates logical organisation and coherence. Demonstrates sound, considerate organisation. Demonstrates typically sound, standard organisation. Reveals passable organisation. Restricted organisation that's partially comprehensible. Poorly introduced and structured. Very disorganised. Incoherent. 20% Readability of expression (incl. accuracy, spelling, grammar, punctuation). Glorious writing type acceptable to the project. Grammar and spelling correct. Fluent writing type acceptable to the project. Grammar and spelling correct. Language fluent. Grammar and spelling correct. Language typically fluent. Grammar and spelling primarily correct. Which means clear, however language not at all times fluent. Grammar and/or spelling comprise errors. Typically comprehensible, however language accommodates errors which detract from the argument. Which means usually unclear and/or frequent errors in grammar and/or spelling. Which means unclear and/or frequent errors in grammar and/or spelling. Poor spelling, grammar and punctuation. Exceptionally poor spelling, grammar and punctuation. Tutorial integrity. Honesty in research; acknowledging and giving credit score to work of others; acceptable use of referencing requirements for self-discipline Sources used are acknowledged within the textual content and reference record. Referencing is right and follows a systematic method acceptable to the self-discipline. All components of particular person references are current. Sources used are acknowledged within the textual content and reference record Referencing is right and acceptable to the self-discipline. All components of particular person references are current. Sources used are acknowledged within the textual content and reference record and used to assist dialogue. Constant, error free utility of related referencing conventions with nice consideration to element. Sources used are acknowledged within the textual content and reference record. Constant utility of related referencing conventions acceptable to the self-discipline with occasional inconsistencies. Makes an attempt to comply with systematic method to the quotation of sources, acceptable to the self-discipline. Utility of related referencing conventions with minor inconsistencies. Some try and cite sources within the textual content however accommodates inaccuracies, inconsistencies and/or omissions. Typically right utility of related referencing conventions with some errors. Citations of sources within the textual content are inconsistent, inaccurate and/or incomplete. Restricted utility of referencing conventions and/or errors. Citations of sources within the textual content are inaccurate and/or incomplete. Entries within the reference record are incomplete and/or absent. No acknowledgement of sources of knowledge in textual content and/or reference record. No acknowledgement of sources of knowledge in textual content and/or reference record. Consideration to goal / content material and vary of data and utilized to activity Addresses the aim of the project comprehensively and imaginatively. Demonstrates complete, detailed and in-depth data base, and a transparent understanding of the bounds to data. Addresses the aim of the project comprehensively. Demonstrates complete detailed and in-depth data base, with an understanding of the bounds to data. Addresses the total goal of the project successfully. Demonstrates an in depth, coherent, in-depth, data base, with a growing appreciation of the provisional nature of data. Addresses the total goal of the project successfully. Demonstrates a far-ranging, well-organised data base, and a few appreciation of the bounds of data. Demonstrates a sound factual and/or conceptual data base and makes use of acceptable terminology. Proof of satisfactory data of matter and use of acceptable terminology. Some related and/or required data confused or important misuse of terminology. Some related and/or required data lacking or confused and important misuse of terminology. Fails to handle the project activity. Little or no related data included. Fails to handle the project activity. No related data included. 40% Use of literature / proof of studying Proof of unbiased studying. Clear, correct, systematic utility of high quality materials. Demonstrates a growing potential to critically appraise materials. Proof of unbiased studying from a balanced mixture of high quality major and a few secondary sources. Clear and correct utility of fabric. Proof of unbiased studying from high quality sources. Clear, correct, systematic utility of fabric. Proof of unbiased studying from good high quality sources. Literature appropriately utilized. Proof of some unbiased studying from acceptable sources and utility of literature. Proof of a slender vary of studying from acceptable sources. Literature is introduced in a descriptive approach. Restricted proof of studying or inappropriate sources used and/or engagement with the literature very superficial. Very restricted proof of studying from acceptable sources. Little engagement with acceptable sources. No engagement with literature. Synthesis: Data gathering and processing Demonstrates a capability to remodel summary info, to assemble new concepts to satisfy the evaluation goal Data and ideas introduced in an progressive option to demonstate a full understanding of the topic. Proof of potential to utilise info processing ideas acceptable to the topic. Data is organised utilizing acceptable buildings and processes resulting in identification of ideas to meet evaluation goal. Collects, collates and categorises info in a structured option to meet evaluation goal Partially collects, collates and categorises info in an try to satisfy evaluation goal Data organisation lacks construction, hindering fulfilment of evaluation goal. Data organisation detracts from the evaluation goal. Restricted organisation of concepts / info No organisation of knowledge 40% Evaluation / Vital reasoning Demonstrates a extremely developed important analysis and evaluation of topic materials. Arguments are clear, coherent, credible and reveal originality. Demonstrates a transparent grasp of evaluation with well-developed, important analysis of topic materials. Arguments are clear, coherent and reveal some originality. Makes efficient use of study to develop important pondering which is built-in into the work. Arguments reveal the flexibility to judge topic materials. Evaluation demonstrates important perception and a capability to distinction different positions close to idea. Makes truthful try at evaluation, demonstrating standard important perception. Makes passable try at evaluation with restricted important perception. Makes an attempt at evaluation with restricted proof of important pondering. Makes an attempt at evaluation ineffective. Incoherent important pondering. Lacks any evaluation. Insufficient proof of important pondering Lacks any evaluation. No proof of important thought. Reflection / utility to apply / conclusion Vital evaluation of private and others’ contributions and the rationale main to those. Demonstrates imaginative interested by potential alternate options and implications for additional apply in a spread of contexts. Conclusions effectively developed and analytical. Critically analyses private contribution and that of others to apply. Considers obstacles to growing acceptable plans of motion. Conclusions effectively developed, displaying important perception with ideas of future actions. Analyses private contribution and that of others to apply via reflection. Considers affect of future actions. Conclusions effectively developed, displaying perception drawn from the physique of the work. Evaluates affect of private contribution and that of others to apply. Considers future actions. Conclusions developed logically in relation to content material. In a position to consider affect on apply and that of others utilizing numerous frames of reference. Identifies some additional actions. Sound conclusions clearly derived from content material. In a position to interpret affect on apply and that of others. Ample conclusions are drawn derived from content material Restricted interpretation of affect on apply. Some understanding of idea. Restricted conclusion drawn from content material. Ineffectual interpretation of affect on apply. Ineffective try to attract conclusion from the content material. Incomplete interpretation of apply implications. Restricted try to attract conclusion. Insufficient interpretation of apply implications. No conclusion. COHERENCE, ORGANISATION, ATTENTION TO ASSESSMENT PURPOSE AND ACADEMIC INTEGRITY CONTENT – KNOWLEDGE AND USE OF LITERATURE ANALYSIS, SYNTHESIS, CONCLUSION AND APPLICATION TO PRACTICE
Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

Read more

Free-revision policy

The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.

Read more

Privacy policy

The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency

Guaranteed 5-30% off for all your orders with us. Try Now!

X