) Assignment 7.1A: Identifying Letters, Phonemes, and Graphemes in Words essay

(1) Assignment 7.1A: Identifying Letters, Phonemes, and Graphemes in Words Template for 7.1A.docx • Task 1) Indicate the number of letters in each word. • Task 2) Indicate the number of phonemes (sounds) in each word. • Task 3) Write the phonemes (sounds) for each word. the Consonant Phoneme Chart and Vowel Phoneme Chart • Task 4) Indicate the number of graphemes (sounds) in each word. • Task 5) Write the graphemes (letters) that represent the phonemes in each word. (2) Assignment 13.3A: Scripting a Mini-lesson & Making an Anchor Chart Task 1) Choose one of the ELAR TEKS listed below. • Make inferences and use evidence to support understanding. • Retell in ways that maintain meaning and logical order. • Summarize texts in ways that maintain meaning and logical order. Task 2) Use the template in Canvas to script a minilesson for that TEK you selected. (Uploaded) Task 3) Create an anchor chart to accompany the minilesson you scripted. (3) Performance Assessment 13.7: Assessing Foundational and Comprehension Skills Instructions Tips for responding to an STR Constructed Response Question: • Read the question carefully before you begin to write your response. • Use bullets to organize your response. • Each bullet should address the tasks in the order they appear in the question. • There is a suggested word count, but you are not limited to that word count. • Your response should directly address each component in depth. • The final version of your response should conform to the conventions of standard English. • Your written response should be your original work, written in your own words, and not copied or paraphrased from some other work. • You may use citations when appropriate for this homework help. Assessment 2: What are the effects of spinal manipulation (HVLA) on adults with chronic low back pain? Article 1: A randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol for The RELIEF Study - PubMed (nih.gov) Article 2: The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on pain relief and function in patients with chronic low back pain: an individual participant data meta-analysis - ScienceDirect Question 1: did the review ask a clearly focussed question? Yes, Question 2: did the authors look for the right type of work? Question 3: do you think the important relevant studies were included? Question 4: did the authors do enough to assess the quality of the included studies? JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR COHORT STUDIES This assignment help Reviewer: Imtithal Diedericks Date: 12/10/2021 Article: A randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol for The RELIEF Study - PubMed (nih.gov) Yes No Unclear N/A Justification Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people to both exposed and unexposed groups? Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? Were the groups/participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment of exposure)? Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur? Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored? Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized? Was appropriate statistical analysis used? Overall appraisal: Include □ Exclude □ Seek further info□ Comments: (whether you find the article any good) JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR COHORT STUDIES Reviewer: Imtithal Diedericks Date: 12/10/2021 Article: The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on pain relief and function in patients with chronic low back pain: an individual participant data meta-analysis - ScienceDirect Yes No Unclear N/A Justification Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people to both exposed and unexposed groups? Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? Were the groups/participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment of exposure)? Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur? Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored? Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized? Was appropriate statistical analysis used? Overall appraisal: Include □ Exclude □ Seek further info□ Comments: (whether you find the article any good) Performance Assessment 5.5A: Analysis of a Phonological Screening Assessment Juan is a first grader at Mesa Ridge Elementary. His teacher, Mr Walker, just completed a phonological screening assessment with the class. Review and analyze Juan's assessment results to determine his strengths and weaknesses with phonological and phonemic awareness skills. In the answer box provided in Canvas, write a response of approximately 200–300 words. ***Be sure to use the course content when responding to the following: • Task 1) Identify the stage of phonological awareness Juan is currently in. • Task 2) Identify one significant need that Juan demonstrates related to phonological or phonemic awareness. Cite specific evidence from the phonological screening assessment to support your analysis. • Task 3) Select and describe one appropriate, effective instructional strategy or activity that would address the need you identified related to phonological or phonemic awareness. • Task 4) Explain why the instructional strategy or activity you described would be effective in addressing the needs you identified and in helping Juan achieve grade-level reading standards. 5.1A: Analyzing Spelling Errors • Ms. Davidson gave a spelling test to her first-grade class. Afterward, she identified the words that were most confusing for her students. Read the directions below to help Ms. Davidson complete an analysis of the spelling errors. • Directions: • Task 1) Download the Assignment 5.1 A: Analyzing Spelling Errors Template • Task 2) Compare each assigned spelling word to the student response. • Task 3) In Column 3, identify the phoneme confusion; which incorrect phoneme did the student choose? • Task 4) In Column 4, identify the type of error the student made (place of articulation, manner of articulation, or both). • Task 5) In Column 5, explain why that error probably occurred. ***The first word in the spelling assessment has been completed for you as an example. • Dasia is a Kindergarten student at Orchard Elementary. Her teacher, Ms. Lennon, is reviewing Dasia's Nonsense Word Fluency assessment and a current writing sample from Dasia's journal to track Dasia's progress with the alphabetic principle. Review and analyze Dasia's assessment results and writing sample to determine her strengths and weaknesses with the alphabetic principle.-Dasia is a kindergarten student at Orchard Elementary School. Her teacher, Lennon, is currently analyzing her Word Fluency assessment and writing sample to identify her weaknesses and strengths. Performance Assessment 6.3A: Analysis of Data on Alphabetic Principle • Dasia's Assessment Data 1.docx or https://smashingessays.com/services/coursework-writing-service/ • In the answer box provided, write a response of approximately 300-500 words. ***Be sure to use the course content when responding to the following: • Task 1) Define and explain the differences between the following terms: phonological and phonemic awareness, alphabet knowledge, the alphabetic principle, and decoding. How does mastering the alphabetic principle support reading fluency? • Task 2) List and explain the skills that must be in place before Dasia is able to decode words. • Task 3) Review Dasia's Nonsense Word Fluency assessment and writing sample. • Task 4) Identify one significant need that Dasia demonstrates related to the alphabetic principle. Cite specific evidence from the assessment to support your analysis. • Task 5) Select and describe one appropriate, effective instructional strategy or activity that would address the need you identified related to the alphabetic principle. • Task 6) Explain why the instructional strategy or activity you described would be effective in addressing the needs you identified and in helping Dasia achieve grade-level reading standards https://anyessayhelp.com/services/ . -Explain why an instructional strategy or activity would be most effective in helping Dasia achieve her goals. clean Predict Assignment 7.1A: Identifying Letters, Phonemes, and Graphemes in Words Template for 7.1A.docx • Task 1) Indicate the number of letters in each word. • Task 2) Indicate the number of phonemes (sounds) in each word. • Task 3) Write the phonemes (sounds) for each word. the Consonant Phoneme Chart and Vowel Phoneme Chart • Task 4) Indicate the number of graphemes (sounds) in each word. • Task 5) Write the graphemes (letters) that represent the phonemes in each word. -research paper writing service
Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

Read more

Free-revision policy

The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.

Read more

Privacy policy

The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency