Changing the Target Audience in Retail Sales “On common, middle-aged shoppers dedicate 39 p.c of their retail expenditure to division retailer services, whereas for youthful shoppers the typical is barely 25 p.c. Because the variety of middle-aged folks will enhance dramatically throughout the subsequent decade, department shops can count on retail gross sales to extend considerably throughout that interval. Moreover, to benefit from the development, these shops ought to start to exchange a few of these merchandise meant to draw the youthful shopper with merchandise meant to draw the middle-aged shopper. Essay 1: The argument that division retail gross sales will enhance within the subsequent 10 years and thus department shops ought to start to exchange merchandise to draw middle-aged shoppers is just not solely logically convincing, because it omits sure essential assumptions To begin with, the argument ignores absolutely the quantity of retail expenditure of middle-aged and youthful shoppers dedicated to division retailer services.
Though youthful shoppers spend a smaller share of their retail expenditure to division retailer merchandise than do the middle-aged shoppers, they may truly spend extra by way of absolutely the quantity. Even when middle-aged shoppers are spending greater than youthful ones in department shops, the argument ignores the chance that the development could change throughout the subsequent decade. Youthful shoppers may choose to buy in department shops than in different forms of shops, and middle-aged shoppers may flip to different forms of shops, too.
It will result in the next expenditure of youthful shoppers in department shops than that of middle-aged shoppers. Apart from, the argument by no means addresses the inhabitants distinction between middle-aged shoppers and youthful ones. Suppose there are extra youthful shoppers than the middle-aged ones now, the overall inhabitants base of youthful shoppers will probably be greater than that of the middle-aged ones if each of them develop on the similar charge within the subsequent decade. Thus there will probably be a much bigger youthful shopper base. Based mostly on the explanations I listed above, the argument is just not utterly sound. The proof in help of the conclusion does little to show the conclusion because it doesn't tackle the assumptions I've already raised. In the end, the argument may need been extra convincing by making it clear that absolutely the inhabitants of middle-aged shoppers are larger than that of the youthful shoppers and the quantity will proceed to develop within the subsequent decade, and that the middle-aged shoppers will proceed to spend extra money in department shops than youthful shoppers do within the subsequent decade. Essay 2:
The argument that retailers ought to change among the merchandise meant to draw the youthful shoppers with merchandise meant to draw the middle-aged shoppers is just not solely logically convincing, because it ignores sure essential assumptions. First, the argument omits the belief that the enterprise volumes of each the middle-aged shoppers and the youthful shoppers are the identical. If the enterprise quantity of the middle-aged shoppers’ 39% is smaller than that of the youthful shoppers’ 25%, the retail gross sales won't enhance throughout the subsequent decade.
Second, even when the enterprise volumes of each the middle-aged shoppers and the youthful shoppers have been the identical within the final decade, the rise of the middle-aged folks within the subsequent decade is just not the identical as the rise of the retail expenditure, for the retail commerce relies upon extra on such components because the financial circumstances, folks’s consuming want. Lastly, the argument by no means assumes the rise of the youthful shoppers throughout the subsequent decade.
If the youthful shoppers enhance on the similar charge and spend the identical sum of money on the products and providers of department shops, the retailers ought to by no means ignore them. Thus the argument is just not utterly sound. The proof in help of the conclusion that the rising variety of middle-aged folks throughout the subsequent decade does little to show the conclusion—that department shops ought to start to exchange a few of their merchandise to draw the middle-aged shoppers because it doesn't tackle the assumptions I've already raised.
In the end, the argument may need been strengthened by making it clear that the enterprise volumes of each forms of shoppers are the identical and comparable, that the rise of a sure kind of shoppers are correlated with the rise of the retail gross sales, and that the expansion charge of the youthful shoppers are the identical as that of the middle-aged shoppers. Essay three: Based mostly on an anticipated enhance within the variety of middle-aged folks throughout the subsequent decade, the writer predicts that retail gross sales at department shops will enhance considerably over the following ten years.
To bolster this prediction, the writer cites statistics exhibiting that middle-aged folks dedicate a a lot larger share of their retail expenditure to department-store providers and merchandise than youthful shoppers do. Because the variety of middle-aged shoppers is on the rise and since they spend greater than youthful folks on department-store items and providers, the writer additional recommends that department shops start to regulate their inventories to capitalize on this development.
Particularly, it is strongly recommended that department shops enhance their stock of merchandise geared toward middle-aged shoppers and reduce their stock of merchandise geared toward youthful shoppers. This argument is problematic for 2 causes. First, a rise within the variety of middle-aged folks doesn't essentially portend an general enhance in department-store gross sales. It does so solely on the belief that different inhabitants teams will stay comparatively fixed.
For instance, if the anticipated enhance within the variety of middle-aged folks is offset by an equally important lower within the variety of youthful folks, there will probably be little or no internet achieve in gross sales. Second, in recommending that department shops change merchandise meant to draw youthful shoppers with merchandise extra appropriate to middle-aged shoppers, the writer assumes that the variety of youthful shoppers won't additionally enhance.
Since a large enhance within the inhabitants of youthful shoppers may conceivably offset the distinction within the retail expenditure patterns of youthful and middle-aged shoppers, it might be unwise to make the really useful stock adjustment missing proof to help this assumption. In conclusion, this argument is unacceptable. To strengthen the argument the writer must present proof that the inhabitants of youthful shoppers will stay comparatively fixed over the following decade.