Communication Plan Final essay

COM 227 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview This course offers you an introduction to the field of public relations. You will develop a foundational basis around the history and ethics of the field, while also exploring what constitutes public relations in a more modern context. You will also become acquainted with the foundational best practices used in public relations and develop the fundamental writing skills required in the field. This course will help you become more acquainted with what public relations is, and learn how to convey that to others in a professional presentation. clean Predict The final project for this course is the creation and evaluation of a public relations campaign for a field or industry of your choice. The final product represents an authentic demonstration of competency because it is common practice to create and evaluate public relations campaigns. The final project focuses on using the four step public relations plan (research, planning, implementation, and evaluation). You will work on each step throughout the course to create a final plan. The project is divided into two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Three and Five. The final product will be submitted in Module Seven. In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:  COM-227-01: Explain how the history of the public relations field influences the contemporary practice of the profession  COM-227-02: Determine an approach to addressing ethical issues in public relations supported by the professional ethics code in public relations  COM-227-03: Develop engaging work appropriate to the field of public relations that accurately reflects AP writing style and best practices  COM-227-04: Utilize the four-step public relations process for informing the development of public relations projects Prompt Specifically, you must address the critical elements listed below. Most of the critical elements align with a particular course outcome (shown in brackets). I. Research: For this part of the summative assessment, you will perform the first step of the four-step public relations process, research. You will describe the best practices and appropriate ethical practices in public relations in your presentation. A. Create at least two slides that provide an overview of how the professional ethics code in public relations guides decision making on conflicts of interest using examples from the ethics code and connecting them to the field you have selected. [COM-227-02] B. Create at least two slides that provide an overview of how the professional ethics code in public relations guides decision making regarding competition among public relations professionals using examples from the ethics code and materials presented in the course. [COM-227-02] 1 C. Create at least two slides that provide an overview of how the professional ethics code in public relations guides decision making regarding the protection and advancement of accurate and truthful information using examples from the ethics code and materials presented in the course, these should connect to the type of industry you have selected. [COM-227-02] D. Discusses best practices for creating presentations in public relations. The notes section should be used, and sources should be properly cited. [COM-227-03] II. Planning: For this part of the summative assessment, you will perform the second step of the four-step public relations process, planning. You will provide an overview regarding the history of public relations and how it exists today for the industry you have selected. Your slides will be tailored to the audience of that industry. A. Create three slides, in your presentation, that discuss the history of PR for your industry, include any major milestones, and how the field uses PR today. [COM-227-04] B. Explains what research was found to support ethics and best practices. The notes section should be used and references provided. [COM- 227-04] C. The presentation must reflect information for your target audience. [COM-227-03] III. Implementing: For this part of the summative assessment, you will perform the third step of the four-step public relations process, implementing. You will create your public relations presentation that contains historical content meant to educate the audience about the history of the field and how it exists today. In your presentation you must: A. Review your overview of the history of public relations including critical milestones and how the field has grown over time. Does any new information need to be added/changed? B. Explain the idea of modern public relations. Be sure to support your response with evidence from the course or research. For example, how is public relations viewed today in this field? How is social media used in public relations? This should be at least two slides. [COM-227-01] C. Explain how the history of the field has influenced the perceptions of the practice today. Be sure to support your response with evidence from the course or research. For example, how has the past behavior of professionals in the field influenced the perception of modern public relations? Include at least two slides that discuss how PR is used in this field today. What is the preferred strategy and why is it effective. [COM-227-01] D. Determine an approach that could be used in addressing ethical issues regarding public relations. Be sure to support your response with evidence from your research and your plan. This could include crisis, violation of policy, development of new technology, etc. [COM-227-02] E. Utilize best practices and AP writing style throughout your presentation and speaker notes. Be sure that your work accurately and appropriately aligns with best practices and AP writing style. [COM-227-03] IV. Evaluation: For this part of the summative assessment, you will perform the fourth step of the four-step public relations process, evaluation. You will reflect on your presentation, identifying potential errors or issues in your presentation and how you might go about addressing or improving those issues. Finally, you will speak to how the four-step process could be used in other avenues of your life. (This will be submitted separately within a Microsoft Word document.) 2 A. Explain potential ways that any errors or issues in your presentation could be improved and justify your response. [COM-227-04] B. Explain how your completed presentation benefited from the four-step public relations process. For example, how did the research step assist in developing your presentation? The planning, implementing, and evaluation steps? How did the process as a whole benefit the presentation? [COM-227-04] C. Explain how you could use the four-step process to plan for personal, professional, or academic experiences in the future. Be sure to support your response with examples. For example, how could the process be applied to an upcoming personal vacation? A project you have been assigned at work? A research assignment in another course? [COM-227-04] Milestones Milestone One: Planning In Module Three, you will submit the planning section of your final project. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone One Rubric. Milestone Two: Implementing In Module Five, you will submit the implementing section of your final project. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Two Rubric. Final Submission: Public Relations Campaign In Module Seven, you will submit your final project. This will include your PowerPoint presentation, along with a Microsoft Word version of your evaluation. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric. Final Project Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your public relations campaign must be 18–22 slides in length and must be written in Associated Press style. The evaluation portion of your final project must be submitted as a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Research: Conflicts of Interest Meets “Proficient” criteria, and examples provided demonstrate a sophisticated awareness of the professional ethics code in public relations regarding conflicts of interest Provides an overview of how the professional ethics code in public relations guides decision making on conflicts of interest using examples from materials presented in the course Provides an overview of how the professional ethics code in public relations guides decision making on conflicts of interest, but overview is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or does not use examples from materials presented in the course Does not provide an overview of how the professional ethics code in public relations guides decision making on conflicts of interest 5.4 3 Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Research: Competition Meets “Proficient” criteria, and examples provided demonstrate a sophisticated awareness of the professional ethics code in public relations regarding competition Provides an overview of how the professional ethics code in public relations guides decision making on competition using examples from materials presented in the course Provides an overview of how the professional ethics code in public relations guides decision making on competition, but overview is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or does not use examples from materials presented in the course Does not provide an overview of how the professional ethics code in public relations guides decision making on competition 5.3 Research: Accurate and Truthful Information Meets “Proficient” criteria, and examples provided demonstrate a sophisticated awareness of the professional ethics code in public relations regarding the protection and advancement of accurate and truthful information Provides an overview of how the professional ethics code in public relations guides the protection and advancement of accurate and truthful information, using examples from the materials presented in the course Provides an overview of how the professional ethics code in public relations guides the protection and advancement of accurate and truthful information, but overview is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or does not use examples from materials presented in the course Does not provide an overview of how the professional ethics code in public relations guides the protection and advancement of accurate and truthful information 5.3 Research: Best Practices Meets “Proficient” criteria, and examples provided demonstrate a sophisticated awareness of the best practices for creating and delivering presentations in public relations Provides an overview of the best practices for creating and delivering presentations in public relations, using examples from materials presented in the course Provides an overview of the best practices for creating and delivering presentations in public relations, but overview is cursory, contains i naccuracies, or does not use examples from the materials presented in the course Does not provide an overview of the best practices for creating and delivering presentations in public relations 8 Planning: Presentation Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response clearly and precisely demonstrates consistency in presenting information Creates a presentation that is logical, uses the notes section, and is tailored to a specific audience Creates a presentation flow of information is provides some detail, but the flow of information is cursory or illogical Does not create a presentation that provides relevant information 8 Planning: Research on Ethics and Best Practices Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response demonstrates keen insight into how previous research on ethics and best practices are applied Explains how presentations incorporate previous research on ethics and best practices Explains how presentations incorporate previous research on ethics and best practices, but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies Does not explain how presentations will incorporate previous research on ethics and best practices 8 4 Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Planning: Audience Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response demonstrates a keen and sophisticated awareness of the needs of the audience being presented to Presentation is developed for the audience being presented to Presentation is somewhat developed for the audience being presented to, but information is cursory or is inappropriate for the audience Does not target the presentation to the audience 8 Implementing: History of Public Relations Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response demonstrates keen insight into the critical milestones in public relations and how they relate to the growth and history of the field Provides a brief overview of the history of public relations, including critical milestones and the growth of the field Provides an overview of the history of public relations as presented in the course, but overview is cursory, not brief, or does not include the critical milestones and growth of the field Does not provide an overview of the history of public relations as presented in the course 4 Implementing: Modern Public Relations Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response demonstrates keen insight into the idea of modern public relations Explains the idea of modern public relations, supporting with evidence from the course or prior research Explains the idea of modern public relations, but explanation is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or is not supported with evidence from the course or prior research Does not explain the idea of modern public relations 4 Implementing: Practice Today Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response makes cogent connections regarding the relationship between the past history of public relations and the modern practice of public relations Explains how the history of the field has influenced the perception of the practice of public relations today, supporting connections with evidence from the course or prior research Explains how the history of the field has influenced the perception of the practice of public relations today. but explanation is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or is not supported with evidence from the course or prior research-How the history of public relations has affected the perception of the field of practice. Does not explain how the history of the field has influenced the perception of the practice of public relations today 4 Implementing: Approach Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of the professional approaches to addressing issues of ethics used in the field of public relations Determines a professional approach that could be used in addressing ethical issues regarding public relations with evidence from prior research and planning Determines a professional approach that could be used in addressing ethical issues regarding public relations, but determination is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or is not supported with evidence from prior research and planning Does not determine a professional approach that could be used in addressing ethical issues regarding public relations 12 5 Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Implementing: Best Practices and AP Writing Style Meets “Proficient” criteria, and presentation and accompanying speaker notes demonstrate a sophisticated awareness of when and how to use best practices and AP style in public relations projects Utilizes appropriate best practices and AP style throughout the presentation and accompanying speaker notes Utilizes best practices and AP style throughout the presentation and accompanying speaker notes, but utilization contains inaccuracies or is not appropriate Does not utilize best practices and AP style throughout the presentation and accompanying speaker notes 12 Evaluation: Improved Meets “Proficient” criteria, and makes a cogent defense of potential improvements Explains potential ways that any errors or issues in the presentation could be improved and justifies response Explains potential ways that any errors or issues in the presentation could be improved but does not justify response, or explanation is cursory or illogical Does not explain potential ways that any errors or issues in the presentation could be improved 4 Evaluation: Four-Step Public Relations Process Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response makes cogent connections regarding the benefits of the individual steps of the four-step process and the process as a whole Explains how the completed presentation benefited from the four-step public relations process Explains how the completed presentation benefited from the four-step public relations process, but explanation is cursory or illogical Does not explain how the completed presentation benefited from the four-step public relations process 4 Evaluation: Personal, Professional, or Academic Experiences Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides cogent examples regarding the personal, professional, or academic applications of the four-step public relations process Explains how the four-step public relations process could be used to plan for personal, professional, or academic experiences in the future, and supports with examples Explains how the four-step public relations process could be used to plan for personal, professional, or academic experiences in the future, but explanation is cursory or illogical Does not explain how the four- step public relations process could be used to plan for personal, professional, or academic experiences in the future 4 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 4 Total 100% 6 COM 227 Final ProjectGuidelines and Rubric Overview Prompt Milestones Milestone One: Planning Milestone Two: Implementing Final Submission: Public Relations Campaign Final Project Rubric Accessibility Report Filename: COM 227 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric.pdf Report created by: Organization: [Enter personal and organization information through the Preferences > Identity dialog.]-COM 227 Final Project Requirements and Rubric Overview Prompts Milestone One: Plan Your Own Milestone Two: Implementation of Final Submission. Summary The checker found no problems in this document. Needs manual check: 2 Passed manually: 0 Failed manually: 0 Skipped: 1 Passed: 29 Failed: 0 Detailed Report Document Rule Name Status Description Accessibility permission flag Passed Accessibility permission flag must be set Image-only PDF Passed Document is not image-only PDF Tagged PDF Passed Document is tagged PDF Logical Reading Order Needs manual check Document structure provides a logical reading order Primary language Passed Text language is specified Title Passed Document title is showing in title bar Bookmarks Passed Bookmarks are present in large documents Color contrast Needs manual check Document has appropriate color contrast Page Content Rule Name Status Description Tagged content Passed All page content is tagged Tagged annotations Passed All annotations are tagged Tab order Passed Tab order is consistent with structure order Character encoding Passed Reliable character encoding is provided Tagged multimedia Passed All multimedia objects are tagged Screen flicker Passed Page will not cause screen flicker Scripts Passed No inaccessible scripts Timed responses Passed Page does not require timed responses Navigation links Passed Navigation links are not repetitive Forms Rule Name Status Description Tagged form fields Passed All form fields are tagged Field descriptions Passed All form fields have description Alternate Text Rule Name Status Description Figures alternate text Passed Figures require alternate text Nested alternate text Passed Alternate text that will never be read Associated with content Passed Alternate text must be associated with some content Hides annotation Passed Alternate text should not hide annotation Other elements alternate text Passed Other elements that require alternate text Tables Rule Name Status Description Rows Passed TR must be a child of Table, THead, TBody, or TFoot TH and TD Passed TH and TD must be children of TR Headers Passed Tables should have headers Regularity Passed Tables must contain the same number of columns in each row and rows in each column Summary Skipped Tables must have a summary Lists Rule Name Status Description List items Passed LI must be a child of L Lbl and LBody Passed Lbl and LBody must be children of LI Headings Rule Name Status Description Appropriate nesting Passed Appropriate nesting Back to Top -research paper writing service
Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

Read more

Free-revision policy

The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.

Read more

Privacy policy

The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency