Negative Impacts of Weapons Technology to social justice
Choose one of the following topics and discuss the ties between the chosen science/technology issue and social justice:
Genetic Engineering, Energy, Climate Change, Weapons Technology, Consumer Electronics, or Social Media.
Write a 2-3 page essay that summarizes the key issues of the topic you chose, identifies the negative effects that the science/technology has on one or more social groups (i.e. treating a people group unfairly), and some potential solutions for the problem if possible.
For example: For climate change, you might discuss the issues of rising sea levels and how they might affect the poor in Bangladesh and the island nations of the Pacific (and how their fate is being dictated by nations such as the US). For genetic engineering, you might discuss the idea of eugenics (improving human population through selective breeding of desirable traits) and its potential for discrimination and genocide. Your topic must be formed into a well-worded thesis that you can defend.
The paper needs to be well written in a logical sequence that flows from topic to topic, with no spelling or grammatical errors. You must give specific evidence for your claims, and include a source using an established format (APA, MLA, etc.) for any supporting evidence you provide in the paper. There must be a literature cited section at the end.
Negative Impacts of Weapons Technology to social justice
Weapon technology has increased suffering among the people through loss of life and destruction of properties across the globe, thus negatively affecting social justice. Weapon technology is regarded as modern military technology that is concerned with the manufacture and creation of different weapons and military equipment to be used in warfare in the event of conflicts between different parties. The different military weapons, tools, and equipment developed include small arms, rocket and missiles, artillery tanks, submarines, naval ships, biological warfare, chemical warfare, and nuclear weapons. On the other hand, social justice entails the fair and just interactions between different parties as determined by social privileges, societal opportunities, and the sharing of wealth. Weapon technology has been employed at different levels from the individual level, societal, and global levels to perpetuate social injustice across the globe.
Negative Impacts of weapon technology
The growth and rise of weapon technology have resulted in negative impacts across the globe resulting in deaths, loss of property, hopelessness, and frustrations among different social groups around the globe. Weapon technology has resulted in increased warfare and conflicts across different parts of the world (Friesen, 17). Conflicts are normal with the interactions of people and states. The escalation of conflicts inclines the conflicting parties to engage in fierce wars as they try to outdo each other. The parties that emerge as winners engage in intense warfare that breaks the other party’s morale to the point they suffered. The aftermath of such conflicts results in deaths and destruction of properties. For instance, in 2003, the United States and Iraq engaged in fierce warfare that resulted in the great loss and damage in the Iraq soil. The United States used overwhelming force using superior weapon technology and intelligence, thus pushing the people of Iraq to a stage of annihilation due to the damage caused (Phillips, 26). Therefore, weapons technology has resulted in losses among the different social groups, especially those that have encountered warfare with superior powers.
Terrorists and other clandestine groups have consistently used weapon technology to cause terror and destruction to social groups perceived as enemies (Mazzone, 43). There are different terrorist groupings across the globe, such as the Taliban, Alshabab, and Bokoharam have acquired superior weapons that are used in causing terror and destruction in social groups with the vied of driving different agendas. For instance, on 2001 September 11th, the al Qaeda terrorist group implemented four coordinated attacks on the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center (Selden, 118). The attack resulted in 2977 deaths and about 25,000 fatalities as well as the destruction of property. The terrorist was able to cause such enormous damage as they employed weapon technology in the attack.
Weapon technology has contributed to mass destruction leading to destruction and confusion in different societies (Pitschmann, 176). The weapon technology has resulted in the development of weapons of mass destruction such as nuclear weapons or the biological weapons that destroy on a large scale. The application of weapons of mass destruction in warfare results in extensive destruction that can rarely be recovered. For instance, the US attack on Hiroshima, Japan, resulted in the total destruction of lives and property. The use of weapons of mass destruction results in the total destruction of the societies.
Weapon technology results in mass production of superior and advanced weapons that result in destruction and other adverse impacts on the social aspects of the people. The weapons technology is designed to cause death and destruction, thus overpowering rivals and enemies. There is a need for strict international laws, policies, and regulations to regulate the sale and manufacture of weapons using weapon technology with the view of enhancing social justice among the members of society.
Friesen, T. Max. “The impact of weapon technology on caribou drive system variability in the prehistoric Canadian Arctic.” Quaternary International 297 (2013): 13-23.
Mazzone, Andrea. “The Use of CBRN Weapons by Non-State Terrorists.” Global Security Studies 4.4 (2013).
Phillips, J. A. (2006). US Policy and Iran’s Nuclear Challenge. Heritage Foundation.
Pitschmann, Vladimír. “Overall view of chemical and biochemical weapons.” Toxins 6.6 (2014): 1761-1784.
Selden, Mark. “A forgotten holocaust: US bombing strategy, the destruction of Japanese cities and the American way of war from World War II to Iraq.” Japan Focus 2 (2007).
Negative Impacts of Consumer Electronics on Social Justice
Consumer electronics have transformed the world in many ways, and they have become ubiquitous in modern society. However, this technology has some negative effects on social justice, including the widening digital divide, exploitation of workers in the production chain, and the lack of access to essential devices and services by marginalized groups.
Widening Digital Divide
The digital divide is the inequality of access to information and communication technologies, such as the internet and mobile phones. Consumer electronics have widened the digital divide because of the high costs of devices and services, and the lack of access to infrastructure in some areas. The digital divide creates disparities in economic, social, and political power, and marginalized groups are the most affected (Friedman & Scholarios, 2021). For instance, people living in rural areas, low-income families, and seniors may not have the resources to buy or maintain modern devices, and they may not have access to high-speed internet services. Consequently, they are left behind in education, job opportunities, health care, and civic participation, among others.
Exploitation of Workers in the Production Chain
Consumer electronics are produced in factories located in developing countries such as China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh. The workers in these factories are often exploited, and their rights are violated. They work long hours in poor conditions, and they are paid meager wages. Some of them are underage, and they are exposed to hazardous chemicals and dangerous machinery. These workers do not have the power to demand better working conditions or wages, and they are often subject to abuse by their employers (Oosterhuis & Lelieveldt, 2019). The exploitation of workers in the production chain of consumer electronics is a violation of social justice, and it contributes to the widening income gap between developed and developing countries.
Lack of Access to Essential Devices and Services
Consumer electronics have become essential in modern society, and they are used for communication, education, entertainment, and health care, among others. However, marginalized groups may not have access to these essential devices and services due to the high costs and lack of infrastructure. For instance, people living in poverty, refugees, and people with disabilities may not have access to smartphones, laptops, or internet services, and they may not be able to benefit from online education, telemedicine, or e-commerce (Marrone et al., 2018). The lack of access to essential devices and services is a violation of social justice, and it perpetuates the cycle of poverty and exclusion.
To address the negative effects of consumer electronics on social justice, several potential solutions can be implemented. One solution is to promote universal access to essential devices and services through public policies and partnerships between governments, private companies, and civil society organizations. This can be achieved through subsidies, tax incentives, and public-private partnerships that aim to provide affordable devices and services to marginalized groups (Marrone et al., 2018).
Another solution is to promote responsible production and consumption of consumer electronics through corporate social responsibility and sustainable development goals. This can be achieved through certification schemes, audits, and monitoring systems that aim to ensure the respect of workers’ rights, environmental standards, and ethical business practices in the production chain (Oosterhuis & Lelieveldt, 2019).
Consumer electronics have transformed the world, but they have also contributed to social injustice, including the widening digital divide, exploitation of workers in the production chain, and the lack of access to essential devices and services by marginalized groups. However, there are potential solutions to address these negative effects, including promoting universal access, responsible production, and consumption, and public-private partnerships. By implementing these solutions, we can ensure that consumer electronics contribute to social justice and human development,