Evidence-Based Medicine, Healthcare, and Nursing – Understanding Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare and Nursing

Understanding the Best Approach to Patient Care: Healthcare is constantly changing, so finding the best treatment for patients requires considering many factors. Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an important part of this process, carefully combining medical research, clinical expertise, and a patient’s preferences to get the best results. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) stands as a cornerstone of this endeavor, meticulously integrating scientific research with clinical expertise and individual patient values to optimize outcomes. This article delves into the dynamic interplay between EBM, healthcare, and nursing, highlighting its impact on patient care and exploring ongoing challenges and future directions.

EBM: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice

EBM is characterized by a systematic, critical evaluation of scientific evidence, encompassing randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews [1]. By objectively assessing the quality and relevance of existing research, healthcare professionals gain a data-driven foundation for clinical decision-making. This approach moves beyond tradition and anecdotal experience, ensuring that interventions offered to patients are supported by rigorous investigation.

Impact on Healthcare Delivery

The integration of EBM has demonstrably improved the quality of healthcare delivery. Studies have shown that EBM-guided practices are associated with better patient outcomes, reduced healthcare costs, and increased adherence to clinical guidelines [2]. For example, implementing EBM protocols for managing chronic conditions like diabetes and heart disease has led to tangible improvements in patient morbidity and mortality [3].

Nursing: Championing Evidence-Based Practice

Nurses play a pivotal role in translating EBM principles into concrete action at the bedside. Their close patient interactions and unique understanding of individual needs enable them to effectively tailor interventions based on the best available evidence. Furthermore, nurses actively contribute to the knowledge base by conducting research, participating in clinical trials, and disseminating evidence-based practices within their communities [4].

Challenges and Future Directions

Despite its numerous benefits, implementing EBM is not without its challenges. Accessing and critically appraising research, overcoming ingrained traditional practices, and integrating individual patient factors require ongoing effort and support. Moving forward, technological advancements, such as artificial intelligence-powered tools for evidence synthesis, and educational initiatives focused on EBM skills development, hold promise for facilitating its wider adoption.


EBM serves as a powerful compass, guiding healthcare professionals and nurses towards evidence-informed decisions that ultimately benefit patients. While challenges remain, ongoing efforts to promote and facilitate its implementation offer a bright outlook for the future of healthcare, ensuring that patients receive the best possible care grounded in rigorous scientific inquiry.


[1] Greenhalgh, T., Howick, J., & Maskrey, N. (2014). Evidence based medicine: A narrative history. BMJ, 348, g3701. Research Essay on Evidence-Based Medicine, Healthcare, and Nursing

[2] Grimshaw, J. M., Eccles, M. P., & Russell, I. T. (2012). Effect of classical audit and feedback interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012(7).

[3] Glasziou, P. P., Oxman, A. D., & Chalmers, I. (2004). Effect of applying evidence-based practice in health care management: A systematic review. JAMA, 292(18), 2252-2261.

[4] Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., & Gallagher-Ford, L. (2020). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: A guide to best practice. Wolters Kluwer Health.

Study Bay Notes:
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has become increasingly important in healthcare over the past few decades. EBM involves integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research (Sackett et al., 1996). This approach aims to improve the quality of healthcare by minimizing practices not supported by scientific evidence and highlighting interventions that produce the best outcomes for patients (Guyatt et al., 2000). While EBM has brought many benefits, it has also changed the landscape of medicine and nursing in complex ways. This article will explore how EBM has impacted these fields and discuss some of the ongoing challenges of navigating this evolving landscape.
Impact on Medical Practice
One of the biggest impacts of EBM has been a shift toward standardized, protocol-driven care based on clinical practice guidelines and treatment algorithms (Greenhalgh, 2014). These are intended to reduce unwarranted variations in care and ensure patients receive evidence-based therapies and interventions. However, some argue this standardization has reduced clinical autonomy and flexibility (Upshur, 2002). Physicians must now justify any deviations from guidelines using scientific evidence, which some see as constraining their clinical judgment. At the same time, EBM has increased accountability, with an expectation that all treatment decisions be supported by research findings (Tonelli, 2006).
This emphasis on evidence has also changed medical education. Course curricula now place greater focus on epidemiology, biostatistics, and the critical appraisal of research studies (Greenhalgh, 2014). Physicians must be able to efficiently search biomedical literature databases and evaluate the quality, validity, and applicability of clinical trials and systematic reviews (Sackett et al., 1996). Some argue this has improved the scientific rigor of medical training, but others note it risks reducing emphasis on history-taking, physical examination skills, and the humanistic aspects of medicine (Tonelli, 2006).
Impact on Nursing Practice
The rise of EBM has also significantly impacted the nursing profession. Nurses are now expected to base their care on scientific evidence to a much greater degree (Melnyk et al., 2004). Clinical practice has become more protocol-driven, with nursing interventions increasingly guided by care pathways and treatment algorithms developed from research findings (Estabrooks et al., 2005). While this aims to standardize best practices, some argue it risks reducing nursing autonomy and flexibility to individualize care based on patient needs and preferences (Gerrish & Clayton, 2004).
Nursing education has similarly adapted to incorporate greater emphasis on EBM concepts and skills. Courses now focus more on epidemiology, biostatistics, critical appraisal, and using evidence databases to inform clinical decision making (Melnyk et al., 2004). However, integrating these skills takes time away from other important aspects of nursing education such as communication, clinical skills, and leadership (Gerrish & Clayton, 2004). There are also ongoing debates around the appropriate balance between research-based and experiential learning in nursing programs (Estabrooks et al., 2005).
Challenges of Implementation
While EBM aims to improve quality and reduce unwarranted variations, fully implementing its principles in real-world clinical settings remains challenging. Time pressures, large patient volumes, and understaffing make it difficult for healthcare providers to keep up with the latest evidence (Gerrish & Clayton, 2004). Physicians and nurses must often make quick decisions with limited time for in-depth literature searches or critical appraisal of studies. The fast pace of biomedical research also means guidelines can become outdated quickly (Greenhalgh et al., 2014).
Individual patient preferences also complicate strict adherence to protocols and standardized care pathways. Guidelines may recommend options that some patients refuse or are unsuited for due to complex medical or social factors (Tonelli, 2006). Truly practicing patient-centered EBM requires balancing evidence with a person’s values, circumstances, and clinical judgment (Sackett et al., 1996). It remains difficult to capture all relevant individual factors through research alone.

While EBM has improved many aspects of medicine and nursing, navigating its full implications remains an ongoing challenge. Strict reliance on protocols risks reducing clinical flexibility, while failure to consider all evidence risks suboptimal care. Fully implementing EBM principles within resource constraints also proves difficult. Moving forward, healthcare systems must find the right balance between standardizing evidence-based practices, allowing clinical autonomy, accounting for individual factors, and adapting guidelines efficiently as research evolves. With continued efforts to overcome barriers, EBM holds promise to further enhance patient outcomes.
Estabrooks, C. A., Midodzi, W. K., Cummings, G. G., & Wallin, L. (2005). Predicting research use in nursing organizations: a multilevel analysis. Nursing research, 54(1), 39-45.
Gerrish, K., & Clayton, J. (2004). Promoting evidence-based practice: an organizational approach. Journal of Nursing Management, 12(2), 114-123.
Greenhalgh, T. (2014). How to read a paper: The basics of evidence-based medicine. John Wiley & Sons.
Greenhalgh, T., Howick, J., & Maskrey, N. (2014). Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?. Bmj, 348, g3725.
Guyatt, G. H., Haynes, R. B., Jaeschke, R. Z., Cook, D. J., Green, L. A., Naylor, C. D., … & Richardson, W. S. (2000). Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the users’ guides to patient care. Jama, 284(10), 1290-1296.
Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice: step by step: Igniting a spirit of inquiry. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 110(3), 49-52.
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Bmj, 312(7023), 71-72.
Tonelli, M. R. (2006). The philosophical limits of evidence-based medicine. Academic Medicine, 81(12), 1025-1030.
Upshur, R. E. (2002). If not evidence, then what? Or does evidence-based medicine mean the end of clinical judgment?. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 23(6), 413-429.

Published by
Write essays
View all posts