References Sources
-
Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D. M., Barnes, H., Cimiotti, J. P., Jarrín, O. F., & McHugh, M. D. (2021). Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine European countries: a retrospective observational study. The Lancet, 397(10288), 1454–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32388-2
-
Kutney-Lee, A., Brewer, C. S., & Lake, E. T. (2020). Staffing, Work Environment, and Workforce Outcomes Among Hospital Nurses: A Cross Study. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(4), 790–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12965
-
Kruse, C. S., Krowski, N., Rodriguez, B., Tran, L., Vela, J., & Brooks, M. (2019). Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open, 7(8), e016242. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016242
-
Rittenhouse, D. R., & Shortell, S. M. (2021). Effects of Accountable Care Organizations on health care outcomes: a systematic review. Health Affairs, 40(10), 1645–1654. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00768
-
Yarnall, K. S. H., Skinner, G. H. C., & Grifell, F. (2022). Nurse advocacy: influencing policy outcomes in health care. Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice, 23(2), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544221077410
Course: NUR 420 – Health Policy & Advocacy in Nursing
Assessment Title: Health Policy Advocacy Paper & Policy Brief
Weight: 25% of course grade
Length / Word Count:
-
Main paper: 2,500 words (±10 %)
-
Policy brief: 2 pages
Due Date: Week 10, by 11:59 PM (via LMS / Turnitin)
Submission Format: -
Main paper: Word (.docx) or PDF
-
Policy brief: separate 2-page PDF
-
APA 7th edition referencing
-
Turnitin plagiarism check enabled
Purpose / Rationale
This assignment helps students integrate scholarly analysis and real-world policy advocacy. You will select a current U.S. (or state) nursing or healthcare policy issue, analyze it using evidence, and craft a persuasive policy brief for decision-makers. The full paper demonstrates critical thinking, policy analysis, stakeholder mapping, and an advocacy roadmap grounded in evidence.
Learning Outcomes
By completing this assignment, you will be able to:
-
Analyze a health policy or legislative issue relevant to nursing or population health.
-
Map stakeholders and power relationships influencing policy change.
-
Synthesize peer-reviewed evidence to support policy proposals.
-
Design a concise, compelling policy brief targeted to decision-makers.
-
Write in clear, scholarly style with correct APA formatting and coherent structure.
Task Instructions
Part A: Policy Analysis Paper (~2,500 words)
Organize your paper under the following suggested headings:
-
Introduction / Problem Definition (~300 words)
-
Describe the policy issue you choose (e.g. safe-staffing mandates, full practice authority for APRNs, telehealth reimbursement, mental health access).
-
Explain its significance for patients, healthcare systems, and nursing.
-
-
Background & Policy Context
-
Historical evolution of the issue.
-
Key existing laws, regulations, or policies.
-
Federal, state, local context (whichever applies).
-
-
Stakeholder & Power Analysis
-
Identify main stakeholders (patients, nursing associations, payers, legislators, regulatory agencies).
-
Analyze their interests, influence, and ability to support or resist change.
-
Optionally include a stakeholder influence map.
-
-
Evidence Base / Literature Synthesis
-
Review recent (2019–2025) peer-reviewed research, reviews, guidelines pertinent to the issue.
-
Present data on outcomes, cost, risks, benefits.
-
Note evidence gaps or controversies.
-
-
Policy Options & Recommendation
-
Propose 2–3 policy alternatives/interventions.
-
Evaluate each (pros/cons, feasibility, resources needed).
-
Select and justify your recommended option(s).
-
-
Implementation Strategy & Advocacy Plan
-
Outline steps for implementation (legislative, regulatory, administrative).
-
Describe the role of nurses/nursing organizations in advocacy.
-
Anticipate barriers and propose mitigation.
-
Suggest evaluation metrics (outcomes, process indicators).
-
-
Conclusion
-
Summarize the need for change, reiterate your recommendation, and propose next steps.
-
Use subheadings, tables or figures (if helpful), and clear signposting. Tables/figures count toward word limit.
Part B: Policy Brief (2 pages)
Produce a standalone, concise policy brief (2 single-spaced pages) directed at a decision-maker (e.g. state legislator, health commissioner, hospital CEO). It should include:
-
Title / Issue headline
-
Executive summary (1 paragraph)
-
Problem & evidence highlights (with key data)
-
Your recommended policy
-
Key stakeholder positions or endorsements
-
Implementation steps / timeline
-
Call to action (what you ask the decision-maker to do)
-
References (3–5 key sources)
Use bullets, bolding, visuals (charts, boxes) where helpful. The brief should be persuasive, accessible, and visually clean.
Assessment Criteria / Rubric
| Criterion | High Distinction / Excellent | Distinction / Good | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarity & significance of problem | Issue is compelling, clearly framed, well justified | Clear issue, mostly well justified | Issue is described but lacks depth | Problem statement is vague or weak |
| Policy & contextual understanding | Deep grasp of historical, legal, and policy context | Good contextual coverage with minor omissions | Basic understanding; some gaps | Weak or inaccurate policy context |
| Stakeholder & power insight | Comprehensive stakeholder mapping, nuanced power analysis | Good stakeholder list, some nuance in power analysis | Basic stakeholder mapping, limited insight | Poor or missing stakeholder/power analysis |
| Use of evidence & literature | Excellent integration of high-quality, recent research with critical appraisal | Good evidence use, some critique | Adequate evidence, but superficial or limited in scope | Lack of evidence, weak sources, poor critique |
| Options & recommendation quality | Multiple viable options, robust justification for recommendation | Clear options and justification, though minor strength gaps | Options exist but recommendation less strong | Weak or missing policy alternatives, recommendation not persuasive |
| Implementation & advocacy planning | Detailed, feasible, addresses barriers, includes evaluation | Clear plan, some details missing | Superficial plan, limited barrier discussion | Vague, unrealistic, missing critical elements |
| Policy brief design & persuasiveness | Brief is sharp, professional, very persuasive with good visuals | Clear and strong brief, some room for polish | Adequate brief, somewhat bland or verbose | Disorganized, unclear, unpersuasive brief |
| Writing quality & referencing | Excellent prose, minor errors, flawless APA referencing | Minor errors in style or APA, mostly accurate | Some writing or APA errors, but overall clear | Frequent errors, poor referencing, lack of coherence |
You may self-assess your work using this rubric before submission.
Additional Notes & Requirements
-
Use at least 5 peer-reviewed sources published between 2019–2025.
-
You may also cite governmental or professional organization reports (e.g. CMS, ANA, state health agencies).
-
Limit reliance on non-scholarly websites.
-
Include at least one figure or table (e.g. stakeholder map, timeline).
-
Late submissions incur a penalty (e.g. –5% per day) unless prior arrangement is made.
-
Academic integrity: your work must be original and properly cited; plagiarism detection will be used.
🇦🇺 Writing for Australian Universities
- AGLC4 (law), APA 7th, Harvard (Business), Vancouver (Health Sciences)
- Grading: HD (85-100%), D (75-84%), C (65-74%), P (50-64%)
- UniMelb, UNSW, ANU, Monash, UQ, UWA standards covered
- Australia uses British English spelling conventions
- Turnitin is widely used — all work is checked before delivery
Australia Pricing Guide
How It Works — 3 Simple Steps
Fill In Your Order Form
Provide your topic, academic level, deadline, referencing style, and any specific instructions or rubric criteria.
Get Matched with a Writer
We assign the best-qualified expert in your subject, familiar with Australia university requirements.
Receive & Review
Download your plagiarism-free paper, review it, and request any free revisions within 14 days if needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this service plagiarism-free?
Yes. Every paper is written from scratch by a human expert to your specific instructions. We run all papers through professional plagiarism detection software and can include a Turnitin-equivalent report on request.
Do your writers know Australia academic standards?
Yes. Our writers are familiar with Australia's university systems, citation styles, and marking conventions. You'll get a paper that meets your institution's exact expectations.
What citation styles do you support for Australia?
We support all major citation styles required by Australia universities, including APA 7th, Harvard, Chicago/Turabian, MLA, OSCOLA, Vancouver, and IEEE.
Can you write just one chapter of my dissertation?
Yes. We write individual dissertation chapters — literature reviews, methodology, data analysis, introductions, conclusions — or the full manuscript from proposal to defence-ready submission.