ONE
To Prepare
Select item 1, 2, or 3 to use for this Discussion. Consider the definitions, differences, and utility of the two terms listed under your item selection. Your response will need to include both terms in the selected item.
Odds ratio and risk ratio
Mortality and morbidity
Incidence and prevalence
Consider how these epidemiologic measures strengthen and support nursing practice.
Assess practice limitations of not using these measures in nursing practice.
Conduct additional research in the Walden Library and other credible resources and then locate two examples in the scholarly literature that support your insights.
Discussion
- Post a cohesive scholarly response that addresses the following:
- Explain how your selected measures of effect strengthen and support nursing practice. Provide at least two specific examples from the literature to substantiate your insights.
- Assess limitations of not using measures of effect in nursing practice.
Resources
- Curley, A. L. C. (Ed.). (2024). Population-based nursing: Concepts and competencies for advanced practice (4th ed.). Springer.
- Chapter 4, “Epidemiological Methods and Measurements in Population-Based Nursing Practice: Part I” (pp. 68-105)
- Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2021). Epidemiology for public health practice (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.
- Chapter 3, “Measures of Morbidity and Mortality Used in Epidemiology”
- Chapter 9, “Measures of Effect”
TWO
To prepare:
Reflect on how different healthcare settings use quality scorecards and dashboards.
Select any healthcare setting that has an established scorecard or dashboard measuring patient experience and quality improvement goals.
Analyze a scorecard or dashboard from your selected organization
Remember to keep the name of your selected organization anonymous.
Reflect on how these measurement systems and measurement methods may impact organizational goal setting in the areas of overall performance and financial stability.
Explore the key indicators involved with scorecards and dashboards, as well as the external quality standards to which they are compared.
Reflect on what the metrics used in the balanced scorecards and dashboards might mean to your specific organization and/or nursing practice. Has your organization established targets for these or similar metrics and are they currently being met? Why or why not?
Discussion
- Provide a brief description of the selected healthcare organization and setting.
- Summarize the quality and patient experience measures on the selected scorecard or dashboard.
- Keep the name of your selected organization anonymous.
- Describe how the selected healthcare organization establishes targets for their organizational improvement plan (e.g., internal or external benchmarking, quality databases).
- Analyze the quality metrics and determine if the organization is meeting these metrics.
- Include any potential impact to the organization for not meeting these metrics (e.g., value-based purchasing, CMS reimbursement and penalties).
- Explain your evaluation
Resources
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2024). The essential Links to an external site.. AACN. https://www.aacnnursing.org/essentials
Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021). Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.
Chapter 1, “Evidence-Based Practice: Context, Concerns, and Challenges” (pp. 3–10)
Chapter 2, “Creating a Supportive EBP Environment” (pp. 13–37)
Chapter 3, “The Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice (JHEBP) Model for Nurses and Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Process Overview” (pp. 43–66)
CMS.gov. (2023, September 6). HCAHPS: Patients’ perspectives of care survey Links to an external site.. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/HospitalHCAHPS
Ransom, E. R., Joshi, M. S., Ransom, S. B., & Nash, D. B. (Eds.). (2023). The healthcare quality book: Vision, strategy, and tools (5th ed.). Health Administration Press & Association of University Programs in Health Administration.
Chapter 8, “Quality Measurement: Measuring What Matters Links to an external site.” (pp. 222–237)
Chapter 9, “Value-Based Purchasing Links to an external site.” (pp. 240–267)
Chapter 12, “Governance for Quality: Building a Culture of Quality and Safety Links to an external site.” (pp. 369–371)
🇦🇺 Writing for Australian Universities
- AGLC4 (law), APA 7th, Harvard (Business), Vancouver (Health Sciences)
- Grading: HD (85-100%), D (75-84%), C (65-74%), P (50-64%)
- UniMelb, UNSW, ANU, Monash, UQ, UWA standards covered
- Australia uses British English spelling conventions
- Turnitin is widely used — all work is checked before delivery
Australia Pricing Guide
How It Works — 3 Simple Steps
Fill In Your Order Form
Provide your topic, academic level, deadline, referencing style, and any specific instructions or rubric criteria.
Get Matched with a Writer
We assign the best-qualified expert in your subject, familiar with Australia university requirements.
Receive & Review
Download your plagiarism-free paper, review it, and request any free revisions within 14 days if needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this service plagiarism-free?
Yes. Every paper is written from scratch by a human expert to your specific instructions. We run all papers through professional plagiarism detection software and can include a Turnitin-equivalent report on request.
Do your writers know Australia academic standards?
Yes. Our writers are familiar with Australia's university systems, citation styles, and marking conventions. You'll get a paper that meets your institution's exact expectations.
What citation styles do you support for Australia?
We support all major citation styles required by Australia universities, including APA 7th, Harvard, Chicago/Turabian, MLA, OSCOLA, Vancouver, and IEEE.
Can you write just one chapter of my dissertation?
Yes. We write individual dissertation chapters — literature reviews, methodology, data analysis, introductions, conclusions — or the full manuscript from proposal to defence-ready submission.