WEEK 1
âThinking About Thinking.â Please
respond to the follow:
Select a quote about âthinkingâ from Chapter 1 that best describes
your own viewpoint and explain why this quote is meaningful to you.Identify which of the sources of enculturation has had the most
impact on your own thinking and explain why you think this is the case.Identify one of the â5 Errors of Thinkingâ that you recently
observed in another or even committed yourself and explain how this
affected productive communication.
WEEK 2
âMemory and the Mind-Body Connectionâ
Please respond to the following:
Describe an example of an episodic memory, perceptual-motor memory,
and semantic memory that you have personally experienced.Explain which of these memories you feel is most affected by one or
more of the senses.
Week 3
Please respond to the follow:
Using and misusing figurative language
may make it difficult for others to understand what you write and what you say.
Choose one (1) of the ten (10) types of figurative language from
the list below.Define the meaning of the term and provide an example.Describe an appropriate circumstance for using the example for the
term or a circumstance when using the term might lead to misunderstanding.
TERMS:
1. idiom
6. amphiboly
2. analogy
7. âflame wordâ
3. metaphor
8. hyperbole
4. simile
9. euphemism
5. cliché
10. colloquialism
Week 4
âGenerating Topic Ideas.â Please
respond to the following:
1. Choose a topic from the list in Appendix A of the
student course guide. NOTE: The topic you choose for this exercise will be the
basis of your âCritical Thinking Paperâ due in Week 10.
2. On a piece of paper or in a Word document on your
computer, use the âbrainstormingâ technique, âstarbursting technique,â and
âFive Ws for Journalistsâ technique to generate ideas for your topic.
3. In the threaded discussion â
o State which topic you chose and the reasons why you
chose the topic.
o Identify which of the three techniques was the most
productive for you as a way of generating ideas. Explain why.
o State which of these techniques you think you might
use for future writing projects. Explain why
Week 5
âEnthymemes in Everyday Life.â Please
respond to the follow:
Identify an example of an enthymeme you encountered this week in
the media or in a conversation.Create a syllogism based on the enthymeme.Determine whether the syllogism is valid or invalid and explain
why.If invalid, identify the reasoning error that is present in the
syllogism.Analyze the syllogism of one (1) other student.
Week 6
âIdentifying Deductive & Inductive
Fallacies.â Please respond to the following:
Locate a piece of advertising that
demonstrates one (or more) of the deductive or inductive fallacies listed
below.
Describe the advertisement example that you located.Identify the fallacy you observed in the advertisement and describe
how this is an example of this type of fallacy.Explain whether or not you believe the fallacy is effective in
persuading customers to purchase or use the product or service being
promoted in the ad.
Informal ductive fallacies
Fallacy of divisionCircular reasoningEither/or fallacyReductio ad Absurdum
Informal inductive fallacies
Hasty generalizationCompositionPot hoc ergo propter hocExtravagant hypothesisFalse analogySlippery slopeGenetic fallacyAppeal to authorityAppeal to traditionIs/ought fallacyBandwagonAppeal to ignorance
Week 7 Discussion
âPlacebo Effect.â Please respond to the
following:
Locate a recent example in the media of
a scientific study involving the placebo effect.
Identify and explain the placebo effectâs function in each step of
the scientific method: observation, hypothesis, experimentation,
verification.Describe how the placebo effect impacted the results of the study.State whether or not you were surprised by the results and why.
Week 9
âProblem Solving.â Please respond to
the following:
Select one (1) of the scenarios below.
Identify the components in the problem.
Explain from how you would get more
information to solve the problem.
Provide the best solution for solving
the problem.
Explain the reasons why you believe
your solution would solve the problem.
Week 10
âQuality Thinking.â Please respond to
the following:
Identify at least one (1) factor which is necessary for evaluating
the quality of your thinking.Explain whether it is easier to evaluate other peopleâs thinking
than it is to evaluate your own. Why or why not?
Week 11
âMake It Real.â Please respond to the following:
Youâve spent a whole quarter learning
how to think more critically, and now it is time to reflect back over the
course.
Identify two (2) or three (3) key concepts or skills you have
learned from this course that you think will be helpful to you in your
current or future positions.Explain why you believe these concepts or skills will be beneficial
to you.
Assignment 1: Sensory
Perceptions
Due Week 3 and worth 100 points
Can you really trust your senses and the interpretation of sensory data to give
you an accurate view of the world? Describe and discuss the accuracy and the
weaknesses of the human senses as they pertain to thinking in general and to
your own thinking in particular.
Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you:
1. Provide at least three (3) reasons for believing in the accuracy or
inaccuracy of sensory information.
2. Identify and describe at least three (3) factors contributing to the
accuracy of sensory data.
3. Discuss the role of memory with regard to the interpretation and evaluation
of sensory data.
4. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Your textbook may
count as one (1) source. At least one (1) of your sources must be obtained from
the collection of databases accessible from the Learning Resources Center Web
page.
Assignment
2: Critical Thinking Paper
Due Week 10 and worth 200 points
Your paper should present a reasoned, convincing argument for a position on a
selected topic.
Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:
1. Follow the five (5) steps of persuasion: establishing credibility,
acknowledging the audienceâs position, constructing a rationale, transplanting
root elements, and asking for a response.
2. Clearly define your position and supporting evidence.
3. Include all the necessary âevidenceâ for the reader to reach the expected
conclusion in each argument in the paper (whether the overriding argument or
one contained in an individual paragraph)
4. Ensure that each argument in the paper (whether the overriding argument or
one contained in an individual paragraph) is valid and free from both formal
and informal fallacies.
5. Include at least four (4) references (sources). At least one (1) of your
sources must be obtained from the collection of databases accessible from the
Learning Resources Center Web page.
The paper should follow guidelines for clear and effectively organized writing:
⢠The paper is well-organized, and every explanation is both complete and easy
to understand.
⢠Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph for the paper.
⢠Main ideas should be addressed in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and
supporting sentences.
⢠Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
⢠The paper should be checked for spelling and grammatical errors.
Week 6 quiz 1
Question 1
All dillybobbers are thingamajigs.
No whatchamacallit is a dillybobber.
Therefore, no whatchamacallits are thingamajigs.
This syllogism is an example of _______________.Answer
the four-terms fallacy.
a syllogism with an
undistributed middle term.
illicit process.
a valid syllogism.
5 points
Question 2
To form a valid syllogism, which premise is missing in the following
argument?
[missing premise]
Sam is a politician.
Therefore, Sam is a dishonest person.Answer
Some politicians are
dishonest persons.
All politicians are
dishonest persons.
Honest people are not
politicians.
Almost no politicians
are honest.
5 points
Question 3
Which of the following disjunctive syllogisms is invalid?
Answer
Either Rich or Phil will win the marathon race
Phil did not win the marathon race
Therefore, Rich won the marathon race
Either the US government will make progress on reducing the national
debt or it will face bankruptcy
The US government will not face bankruptcy
Therefore, the US government will make progress on reducing the national
debt
Either the Pittsburgh Penguins will win the Stanley Cup or their coach
will be fired
The Pittsburgh Penguins fired
their coach
Therefore the Pittsburgh Penguins did not win the Stanley Cup
Either you will pass this exam or you will not pass this exam
You passed this exam
Therefore, you possibly did not fail the exam
5 points
Question 4
Which one of the following hypothetical syllogisms isinvalid? Use the
section on “hypothetical syllogisms” in the textbook to analyze these
syllogisms.
Answer
If P, then Q.
P.
Therefore, Q.
If P, then Q.
Not Q.
Therefore, not P.
If and only if P, then Q.
Not P.
Therefore, not Q.
If P, then Q.
Not P.
Therefore, not Q.
5 points
Question 5
In the following syllogism, the major term is _______________.
All human beings are mortal.
Ann is a human being.
Ann is mortal.Answer
human beings
Ann
mortal
none of the above
5 points
Question 6
Which rule is being violated in the following syllogism?
Only man (not the plants or animals) is that which has been called by
God to avoid sin and reap the rewards of heaven.
Martha is not a man.
Therefore, Martha is not that which has been called by God to avoid sin
and reap the rewards of heaven.Answer
undistributed middle
equivocation
illicit minor
illicit major
5 points
Question 7
Which of the following statements is aparticularproposition?Answer
Andrew is a monster.
All men are monsters.
Some men are monsters.
Only men are monsters.
5 points
Question 8
When the premises are true and the syllogism is valid, we have a(n)
_______ argument.Answer
illogical
perfect
sound
inductive
5 points
Question 9
Which one of the following statements is auniversalproposition?Answer
Karen is a woman.
All women are mortal.
Some women are caring
persons.
Karen is a woman and
knows many women herself.
5 points
Question 10
Complete the following syllogism: All X are Y; Some Z are X; Therefore,
______________.Answer
some Z are Y.
some X are Z.
all X are Z.
all Z are Y.
5 points
Question 11
Premisesin syllogisms can be ________________.Answer
true
false
valid
all of the above
a and b
5 points
Question 12
Which one of the following syllogisms isinvalid? Use the syllogistic
rules to determine which argument does not pass all of them.
Answer
No X are Y.
Some Z are X.
Therefore, some Z are not Y.
Some X are Z.
All X are Y.
Therefore, some Y are Z.
Some X are Y.
Some Z are X.
Therefore, some Z are Y.
Some X are not Z.
All X are Y.
Therefore, some Y are not Z.
5 points
Question 13
A basic form of deductive argument is ________.Answer
inductive reasoning.
the proposition.
causation.
the syllogism.
5 points
Question 14
A syllogism in which one of the premises is missing is called a(n)
_________________.Answer
soft deductive
argument.
analogical argument.
sentential argument.
enthymeme.
5 points
Question 15
In a valid syllogism, if the first two premises are true, then
______________.Answer
the conclusion must be
true.
the conclusion must be
false.
the conclusion could be
either true or false.
the conclusion must be
valid.
5 points
Question 16
Which rule does the following syllogism violate?
All persons in the secretaries’ union are persons who make a lot of
money.
Ann is a secretary.
Therefore, Ann is a person who makes lots of money.Answer
equivocation
illicit minor
four-terms fallacy
invalid conversion
5 points
Question 17
Which one of the following is an example of
ahypotheticalstatement?Answer
Either I will go to the
store or I will go to the bank.
If Karen returns, then
I will return also.
Robert is not a very
nice man.
All of the above.
5 points
Question 18
The syllogism itself, not the premises, can be _____.Answer
valid.
true.
false.
all of the above.
5 points
Question 19
If one of the statements in a syllogism isparticular, the conclusion
_____________.Answer
must be particular.
must be universal.
can be particular or
universal.
must be singular.
5 points
Question 20
Which is true?
Answer
A deductive argument always ends with a conclusion that is a statement
of probability, no matter how remote that probability.
A sound deductive argument is one that has valid form and true premises.
Premises of deductive arguments are never derived through induction.
None of the above are true
Phil210 week 7 quiz 2
Question 1
Every member of the Delta Club is over 70 years old. Therefore, the
Delta Club must be over 70 years old.Answer
Ignorance
Composition
Authority
Circular reasoning
5 points
Question 2
The idea that black people in this country live in poverty is
ridiculous. Look at Bill Cosby. He’s a millionaire. And so are Denzel
Washington and Oprah Winfrey.Answer
Division
Hasty generalization
False Analogy
Composition
5 points
Question 3
No one has ever proved that the human fetus is not a person with rights.
Therefore, abortion is morally wrong.Answer
Ignorance
Composition
Authority
Circular reasoning
5 points
Question 4
If someone rents a piece of land and plants crops on it, the landlord is
never permitted to come and take those crops for himself when harvest time
arrives. Similarly, if couples enlist the services of a surrogate mother to
provide them with a baby, the mother should never be allowed to welch on the
deal and keep the baby for herself once it is born.Answer
Division
False analogy
Equivocation
No fallacy
5 points
Question 5
The farmers of our state have asked that we introduce legislation to
provide subsidies for soybeans. Unfortunately, we will have to turn down their
request. If we give subsidies to the soybean farmers, then the corn and wheat
growers will ask for the same thing. Then it will be the cotton growers, citrus
growers, truck farmers, and cattle raisers. In the end, the cost will be
astronomical.Answer
Authority
Circular reasoning
Genetic
Slippery slope
5 points
Question 6
Terrorists from the Middle East have crossed our borders and traveled
through the country at will. Obviously the Immigration Service has not been
doing its job.Answer
Circular reasoning
Post hoc ergo propter
hoc
Authority
Slippery slope
5 points
Question 7
Motives and desires exert forces on people, causing them to choose one
thing over another. But force is a physical quantity, governed by the laws of
physics. Therefore, human choices are governed by the laws of physics.Answer
Division
False analogy
Equivocation
No fallacy
5 points
Question 8
When a car breaks down so often that repairs become pointless, the car
is thrown on the junk heap. Similarly, when a person becomes old and diseased,
he or she should be mercifully put to deathAnswer
Division
Hasty generalization
False Analogy
Composition
5 points
Question 9
All persons act in order that they might get pleasure.Even so-called
altruistic persons who help others so much that they do almost nothing for
themselves get pleasure out of giving.Otherwise, they wouldn’t do it. Suppose a
person hits himself over the head with a hammer.He must get pleasure from it,
because why else would he do it if he didn’t get pleasure from it?Answer
Circular reasoning
Composition
Either/Or Fallacy
Post hoc ergo propter
hoc
5 points
Question 10
Televangelist Jerry Falwell said that God’s anger with feminism led to
the destruction of the World Trade Center. Given Falwell’s closeness to God, we
have no alternative than to blame the feminists for this atrocity.Answer
Ignorance
Composition
Authority
Circular reasoning
5 points
Question 11
Of course animals have rights. Just look at how powerless they are in
comparison with modern humans.Answer
Ignorance
Composition
Authority
Circular reasoning
5 points
Question 12
White sheep eat more than black sheep (because there are more of them).
Therefore, this white sheep eats more than that black sheep.Answer
Division
False analogy
Equivocation
No fallacy
5 points
Question 13
We know that induction will provide dependable results in the future
because it has always worked in the past. Whatever has consistently worked in
the past will continue to work in the future, and we know that is true because
it has been established by induction.Answer
Circular reasoning
Post hoc ergo propter
hoc
Authority
Slippery slope
5 points
Question 14
Raising a child is like growing a tree. Sometimes violent things, such
as cutting off branches, have to be done to force the tree to grow straight.
Similarly, corporal punishment must sometimes be inflicted on children to force
them to develop properly.Answer
False analogy
Post hoc ergo propter
hoc
Circular reasoning
Ignorance
5 points
Question 15
Either we have prayer in our public schools or the moral fabric of
society will disintegrate. The choice should be obvious.Answer
Circular reasoning
Composition
Either/Or Fallacy
Post hoc ergo propter
hoc
5 points
Question 16
Rhubarb pie is a dessert. Therefore, whoever eats rhubarb pie eats a
dessert.Answer
Bandwagon
Either/Or fallacy
Division
No fallacy
5 points
Question 17
If you find yourself paralyzed in bed for a few moments and see little
creatures by your bed, you might conclude that you had experienced some kind of
UFO alien abduction.Answer
Hasty generalization
Post hoc ergo propter
hoc
Extravagant hypothesis
Ignorance
5 points
Question 18
A woman’s place is in the home. That’s the way it’s always been, so
that’s the way it ought to be.Answer
Tradition
Composition
Post hoc ergo propter
hoc
Bandwagon
5 points
Question 19
Either the government imposes price controls on the cost of prescription
drugs, or the pharmaceutical companies will continue to reap huge profits.
Therefore, price controls must be imposed, because we cannot tolerate these
huge profits any longer.Answer
Bandwagon
Either/Or fallacy
Division
No fallacy
5 points
Question 20
Karen has just moved in with her boyfriend. She claims that living
together before marriage is ethical since everyone is doing it now.Answer
Bandwagon
Either/Or fallacy
Division
No fallacy
Week 9 quiz
Question 1
If students play video
games, their school work will suffer, and they will not have the ability
to succeed in life, ending up in lower paying jobs and needing government
programs, which will increase our taxes. So video games will increase our
taxes.Answer
Appeal
to fear
Slippery
Slope
Red
herring
Tu
quoque
5 points
Question 2
Reporter: Congressman, What
do you have to say about the reports on your campaign’s questionable fund
raising activities?
Congressman: I am very humbled and grateful to the generosity of my
supporters, and I will continue to do my utmost to represent our
district’s interests and concerns in Washington.Answer
Red
herring
Ad
hominem
Appeal
to pride
Ignoring
the question
5 points
Question 3
If you are opposed to the
North American Free Trade Agreement, you are obviously opposed to free
trade.Answer
Appeal
to pity
Composition
Straw
man
Ad
hominem
5 points
Question 4
John has really worked hard
on his term project, and he will really be depressed if he does not make
an A. For these reasons, you just have to give him an A on his project.Answer
Appeal
to pride
Appeal
to pity
Ad
hominem
Red
herring
5 points
Question 5
Officer, How can you ticket
me for speeding, when I see cops speeding all the time?Answer
Appeal
to fear
Slippery
Slope
Red
herring
Tu
quoque
5 points
Question 6
This administration is not
anti-German, as it has been alleged. Germany is a great country. It has
contributed immensely to the world’s artistic treasury. Goethe and
Schiller made magnificent contributions to literature, and Bach,
Beethoven, Wagner, and Brahms did the same in music.Answer
Red
herring
Ad
hominem
Appeal
to pride
Ignoring
the question
5 points
Question 7
Since Sodium and Chloride
are each toxic to humans, the combination of sodium and chloride would be
harmful to people.Answer
Appeal
to pity
Composition
Straw
man
Ad
hominem
5 points
Question 8
Humanitarian groups have
argued in favor of housing for the poor. Apparently what they want is
another high-density project. Unfortunately, these projects have been
tried in the past and have failed. In no time they turn into ghettos with
astronomical rates of crime and delinquency. Chicago’s Cabrini-Green is a
prime example. Clearly, these humanitarian arguments are not what they
seem.Answer
Appeal
to pity
Composition
Straw
man
Ad
hominem
5 points
Question 9
Gay and lesbian groups have
argued in favor of legislation to prevent their people from being
discriminated against. But we must remember that a genetic basis for
homosexuality has yet to be discovered. Granted, some studies indicate
that homosexuality has a biological origin, but these studies are too
limited to be conclusive. Thus, the safest policy right now is to take no
action at all on these questions.Answer
Appeal
to fear
Slippery
Slope
Red
herring
Tu
quoque
5 points
Question 10
It was his fault, Officer.
You can tell by the kind of car I’m driving and by my clothes that I am a
good citizen and would not lie. Look at the rattletrap he is driving, and
look at how he is dressed. You can’t believe anything that a dirty,
longhaired hippie like that might tell you. Search his car; he probably
has pot in it.Answer
Red
herring
Ad
hominem
Appeal
to pride
Ignoring
the question
5 points
Question 11
There is a good deal of talk
these days about the need to eliminate pesticides from our fruits and
vegetables. But many of these foods are essential to our health. Carrots
are an excellent source of vitamin A, broccoli is rich in iron, and
oranges and grapefruits have lots of vitamin C.Answer
Appeal
to fear
Tu
quoque
Ad
hominem
Red
herring
5 points
Question 12
Child to parent: Your
argument that I should stop stealing candy from the corner store is no
good. You told me yourself just a week ago that you, too, stole candy when
you were a kid.Answer
Appeal
to fear
Tu
quoque
Ad
hominem
Red
herring
5 points
Question 13
Why can’t I use that swear
word? I have heard you use it.Answer
Appeal
to fear
Tu
quoque
Ad
hominem
Red
herring
5 points
Question 14
Environmentalists are
continually harping about the dangers of nuclear power. Unfortunately,
electricity is dangerous no matter where it comes from. Every year
hundreds of people are electrocuted by accident. Since most of these
accidents are caused by carelessness, they could be avoided if people
would just exercise greater caution.Answer
Appeal
to pride
Appeal
to pity
Ad
hominem
Red
herring
5 points
Question 15
You are all intelligent people,
so you should be able to see the fallacy in his statement.Answer
Appeal
to pride
Appeal
to pity
Ad
hominem
Red
herring
5 points
Question 16
Officer, please excuse my
going over the speed limit, but my mother is ill and I’m being audited by
the IRS, and I don’t know how I can meet all my bills.Answer
Appeal
to pride
Appeal
to pity
Ad
hominem
Red
herring
5 points
Question 17
Congress shouldn’t bother to
consult major universities about educational appropriations. As members of
educational establishment, they will naturally want as much money for
education as they think they can get.Answer
Appeal
to pride
Appeal
to pity
Ad
hominem
Red
herring
5 points
Question 18
Professor Andrews, surely I
deserve a B in logic. I know that I have gotten F’s on all the tests, but
if you give me an F for my final grade, I will lose my scholarship. That
will force me to drop out of school, and my poor, aged parents, who yearn
to see me graduate, will be grief-stricken for the rest of their
lives.Answer
Appeal
to pity
Composition
Straw
man
Ad
hominem
5 points
Question 19
If we make an exception for
you, then we’ll have to make an exception for everyone.Answer
Appeal
to fear
Slippery
Slope
Red
herring
Tu
quoque
5 points
Question 20
Dr. Jones, this seminar was
the best course I have had. I wondered if we could discuss my
grades?Answer
Appeal
to pride
Appeal
to pity
Ad
hominem
Red
herring
🇦🇺 Writing for Australian Universities
- AGLC4 (law), APA 7th, Harvard (Business), Vancouver (Health Sciences)
- Grading: HD (85-100%), D (75-84%), C (65-74%), P (50-64%)
- UniMelb, UNSW, ANU, Monash, UQ, UWA standards covered
- Australia uses British English spelling conventions
- Turnitin is widely used — all work is checked before delivery
Australia Pricing Guide
How It Works — 3 Simple Steps
Fill In Your Order Form
Provide your topic, academic level, deadline, referencing style, and any specific instructions or rubric criteria.
Get Matched with a Writer
We assign the best-qualified expert in your subject, familiar with Australia university requirements.
Receive & Review
Download your plagiarism-free paper, review it, and request any free revisions within 14 days if needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this service plagiarism-free?
Yes. Every paper is written from scratch by a human expert to your specific instructions. We run all papers through professional plagiarism detection software and can include a Turnitin-equivalent report on request.
Do your writers know Australia academic standards?
Yes. Our writers are familiar with Australia's university systems, citation styles, and marking conventions. You'll get a paper that meets your institution's exact expectations.
What citation styles do you support for Australia?
We support all major citation styles required by Australia universities, including APA 7th, Harvard, Chicago/Turabian, MLA, OSCOLA, Vancouver, and IEEE.
Can you write just one chapter of my dissertation?
Yes. We write individual dissertation chapters — literature reviews, methodology, data analysis, introductions, conclusions — or the full manuscript from proposal to defence-ready submission.