Compare and contrast the contributions made by Jane Addams and Margaret Sanger

Posted: January 18th, 2023

INSTRUCTIONS

Your writing must be formal. should be in full-text, not attachments. An introduction, body, and
conclusion are expected minimum 5 paragraph essay. DO NOT exceed the word limit. You must cite any information in your 500–1000-word response limit that is not common knowledge. Only course materials may be cited. You are required to cite the textbook within the essay–please follow your quote or reference with the page number, for example (409) or location number if you are using a digital copy of the textbook, for example, (Location 1828). I recommend a maximum of two direct quotes for essays of this length. Only course materials may be cited. You must use quotation marks around any statements copied from the text (along with the page number, cited) in order to avoid committing plagiarism. Failure to properly cite information will result in a substantial
loss of points.
Answer Question PICK ONE OF QUESTIONS TO ANSWER
1 1. In the context of Progressive reform, compare and contrast the contributions made by Jane Addams and Margaret Sanger.
2. In the context of the cult of domesticity, women’s legal rights, and class, compare and contrast the experiences of the accused: Lizzie Borden and Mrs. Wright (Trifles).
3. Explain, in detail, how the 19th Amendment to the Constitution was achieved.
4. Assignment Help by UK’s No.1 UK Essays Writing Service | Homework Help Online in UK Coursework Help – Analyze the impact of the Great Depression and World War II on American women.
5. Explain, in detail, the resurgence of the Cult of Domesticity in post-World War II America.

Please note: Compare and contrast requires an analysis of both similarities and differences.
The screenshots are the book the pages are at the bottom so you can site it this is the book the screenshots are for the book called :
Through Women’s Eyes: An American History With Documents 5th Edition

—-
Writing Historical Essays: A Write My Essay Today: No1 Essay Writing Service AU for Your Academic Papers – Guide for Undergraduates adapted from the Rutgers University History Department:
Section 1: What Is Historical Writing?
Elements
The basic elements of academic essay writing are two: a thesis and evidence, divided into three parts: an introduction, the systematic development of an argument, and a conclusion. All scholarly writing, from the most concise paper to the longest book, follows these basic guidelines.
Thesis
Historical essay writing is based upon the thesis. A thesis is a statement, an argument which will be presented by the writer. The thesis is in effect, your position, your particular interpretation, your way of seeing a problem. Resist the temptation, which many students have, to think of a thesis as simply “restating” an instructor’s question. The writer should demonstrate originality and critical thinking by showing what the question is asking, and why it is important rather than merely repeating it. Your own informed perspective is what matters. Many first-year students ask whether the “thesis” is not just their “opinion” of a historical question. A thesis is indeed a “point of view,” or “perspective,” but of a particular sort: it is based not only on belief, but on a logical and systematic argument supported by evidence. The truism that we each have “our own” opinions misses the point. A good critical essay acknowledges that many perspectives are possible on any question, yet demonstrates the validity or correctness of the writer’s own view.
Thesis and Evidence
To make a good argument you must have both a strong central thesis and plausible evidence; the two are interdependent and support each other. Some historians have compared the historian’s craft to assembling and presenting a case before a jury. A strong statement of thesis needs evidence or it will convince no one. Equally, quotes, dates, and lists of details mean nothing by themselves. Your task is both to select the important “facts” and to present them in a reasonable, persuasive, and systematic manner which defends your position. To support your argument, you should also be competent in correct citation.
Historical Writing
Be aware also that “historical” writing is not exactly the same as writing in other social sciences, in literature, or in the natural sciences. Though all follow the general thesis and evidence model, historical writing also depends a great deal on situating evidence and arguments correctly in time and space in narratives about the past. Historians are particularly sensitive to errors of anachronism—that is, putting events in an “incorrect” order, or having historical characters speak, think, and act in ways inappropriate for the time in which they were living. Reading the past principally in terms of your own present experience can also create problems in your arguments. Avoid grand statements about humanity in general, and be careful of theories which fit all cases. Make a point of using evidence with attention to specificity of time and place, i.e. “context.”
Section 2: Steps in Preparing an Historical Essay
1. Understand the question being asked.
Pay attention to the way it is worded and presented. Be aware, for example, that “evaluate” does not mean the same thing as “describe,” and neither is the same as “compare/contrast,” or “analyze.” What are the key words? Can you properly define them? What sort of evidence is required to respond effectively?
2. Prepare the material.
Begin reading (or re-reading) your texts or documents. Students often ask: “How can I give you a thesis (or write an introduction) before I have done all the reading?” Obviously, you cannot write a good paper if you haven’t done the readings, so be sure to keep up. Remember, however, that merely “reading everything” doesn’t guarantee you’ll do good writing. Some students rush through assignments, others highlight every line, both thinking that by counting pages or words they are doing well. As you read the important point is to identify critical arguments in the texts. Don’t just read for “information.” Do a “strong reading” of your materials—critically examine or reexamine your sources with questions in mind. What is the author saying? What are his or her stated and unstated assumptions? What kind of evidence supports the arguments and how is it used? What do particular documents or texts tell you about the time in which they were written? Your questions will be the beginning of your own thesis.
3. First Draft
As noted above, all serious writing is done in drafts, and not the night before. Even if you are pressed for time (as, of course, you will be) give yourself enough time to review and revise your own writing. Students will sometimes turn in papers they have never actually read themselves; this is a mistake which shows. Think of the first or “preliminary” draft as a detailed outline. Establish your thesis and see how it looks in writing. Is it too general or specific? Does it address the questions asked by the instructor? Because the thesis is so critical, small changes in it will have a big impact. Don’t be afraid to refine it as often as necessary as you continue reading and writing.
As you write, pay attention to the following points:
• Organize your ideas on paper. Order your arguments and connect them to the relevant supporting evidence. If the evidence contradicts your thesis, you will have to rethink your thesis. Obviously, you must not alter the evidence, but always look for some citation or text which makes your point better, clearer, more precise, more persuasive. Avoid needlessly long quotes which only fill up space, and be sure what you select actually makes the point you think it does. All citations must be integrated logically and systematically into your argument. Remember that no quote “speaks for itself.” Your job is not only to select evidence, but to explain and analyze what you cite, to demonstrate the meaning and importance of what you choose.
• Be attentive to paragraph construction and order. Paragraphs should have strong topic sentences and be at least five sentences long. Try to show development in your argument. Point one should lead logically to point two in paragraph after paragraph, section after section. Avoid simply listing and detailing your arguments in the order which they occur to you. Though there may be no absolutely correct sequence in presenting an argument, a thoughtful ordering and systematic development of points is more convincing than ideas randomly thrown together.
• Pay attention to transitions: when you switch to a new argument, let the reader know with a new topic sentence. Resist the temptation of thinking, “they’ll know what I mean.” Don’t make your reader guess where you are going or what you are trying to say; the purpose of an essay is to communicate and to convince.
• Take time with your conclusion, which should close and summarize your arguments. Remember that conclusions can have a big impact on the reader, as closing statements do to a jury. You are of course not being judged, but—as part of the scholarly process—your work is being evaluated, so try to make the best presentation possible.
4. Drafts and Final Draft
Now you have completed your draft. Return to your introduction. Is the thesis clearly stated? Have you established the argument and evidence you will present? Rephrase your thesis if necessary. You may not even be clear about the final thesis until you have written much of the paper itself and seen how the argument holds together. Add examples or delete non-relevant materials and make sure paragraphs connect with transitions and topic sentences. Proofread the work: set it aside for some time and come back to it, or try reading it aloud to yourself. Whenever possible try to have someone else read your work and comment on it. Finally, check for sense, grammar, spelling, and mechanical and typographical errors.
Section 3: Grading, Originality & General Observations
A Need first-class papers? Get Fast Essay Writers US & urgent essay writing service Ca – Note on Grading
Every professor or instructor has his or her own standards for excellent, good, average, and unacceptable work. “Standards” means that some papers will receive higher marks than others. A common grading misunderstanding arises from a student belief that answering a question “correctly” in essay form means an automatic “A.” From an instructor’s point of view, you do not get credit for excellence by doing what you are supposed to be able to do: write coherently and intelligently with a thesis, introduction, argument, and conclusion. This is only “competent” work. How well you write is what makes the difference. Do you detail your arguments, define terms, make logical connections, expand points, develop ideas, read sources in original and imaginative ways? The difference between competent and excellent work is difficult to define. Read your own work critically. Are you making the easy points most students would make? Are you really citing and examining the texts? Have you given careful thought to argument and presentation, and the logic of your conclusions? Excellent work begins when you challenge yourself.
Originality and Plagiarism
Students are sometimes overwhelmed when asked to produce original, critical work. What could they say which has not already been said by an expert? No one asks you to be an expert. Your originality lies in your talent as a critical reader and a thoughtful writer. Whether you are studying many sources for a research paper or a few passages from one text, what matters is how you select, present, and interpret materials. “Originality” means speaking in your own words. You must at all costs avoid plagiarism, which is a crime and means automatic failure. Plagiarism means taking credit for work which is not your own, and can involve: 1) copying directly or paraphrasing without acknowledgment from published sources; 2) purchasing essays and term papers; 3) having someone else do the assignment for you; 4) turning in a paper previously submitted for another (or the same) class. Pay attention to point 1: changing the wording of a passage is still plagiarism if you don’t credit the author for the ideas you are borrowing. Points 2-4 are obvious cases of cheating. A strict definition of plagiarism is as follows:
“The appropriation of ideas, language, or work of another without sufficient acknowledgment that the material is not one’s own. Although it is generally recognized that everything an individual has thought has probably been influenced to some degree by the previously expressed thoughts and actions of others, such influences are general. Plagiarism involves the deliberate taking of specific words and ideas of others without proper acknowledgment.”
Avoid plagiarism by preparing well, relying on your own words and judgments, and—when citing evidence—use proper citation. Attention to plagiarism should not discourage you from using sources to the fullest; on the contrary it should challenge you to think critically about how you make ideas your own, what debts you owe to others, and how you put the two together to do intellectually honest and original writing.

—>
In the context of Progressive reform, Jane Addams and Margaret Sanger made different contributions. Jane Addams was a social reformer and leader in the settlement house movement, which aimed to improve living conditions for immigrants and the working poor in urban areas. She also advocated for women’s suffrage and peace. Margaret Sanger was a birth control activist who worked to make contraception more widely available and to educate women about their reproductive health. She also advocated for women’s rights and autonomy.

In the context of the cult of domesticity, women’s legal rights, and class, Lizzie Borden and Mrs. Wright (Trifles) had different experiences. Lizzie Borden was accused of murdering her father and stepmother in 1892, in a case that received widespread public attention. She was ultimately acquitted, but her case highlighted the limited legal rights of women at the time and the cultural expectation that women should be submissive and domestic. Mrs. Wright, a character in the play “Trifles,” is accused of killing her husband. Like Lizzie Borden, she is seen as an outsider and her actions are judged harshly because they go against the cult of domesticity. However, in contrast to Borden, Mrs. Wright is not acquitted and her guilt is not questioned.

The 19th Amendment to the Constitution, which granted women the right to vote, was achieved through a combination of grassroots activism and political lobbying. The suffrage movement began in the mid-19th century, led by women such as Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who advocated for women’s rights through speeches, petitions, and other forms of activism. In the early 20th century, the movement gained momentum and split into two factions: one focused on gaining the right to vote through a constitutional amendment, and the other focused on gaining suffrage through state-by-state campaigns. Eventually, the National Woman’s Party, led by Alice Paul, focused on pressuring the government to pass a constitutional amendment. After much lobbying, the 19th Amendment was passed by Congress in 1919 and ratified by the states in 1920.

The Great Depression and World War II had a significant impact on American women. During the Great Depression, many women were forced to enter the workforce to support their families, as unemployment rose and wages fell. However, women faced discrimination in the workplace and were often paid less than men. During World War II, women played an important role in the war effort by working in factories and other jobs traditionally held by men, while also taking care of their families and homes. This experience helped to break down the traditional gender roles and opened up new opportunities for women in the workforce.

After World War II, the Cult of Domesticity experienced a resurgence in America. This was due to a number of factors, including the return of soldiers from the war, the baby boom, and the Cold War. Many women were encouraged to leave the workforce and return to the home, in order to make room for returning veterans and to help boost the economy. Additionally, the Cold War mentality led to a focus on traditional values, such as motherhood and the nuclear family, as a way to counter the perceived threat of communism. As a result, women were again encouraged to take on the role of homemaker and to prioritize their duties as wife and mother over their careers.