Due 1/20/2023
Part 1 (3 slides) Digital presentation in which you compare and contrast the scientific and humanistic approach to evaluation. Cite at least two other references (at least one must be an online source). Be sure to provide support for your comments from research-based literature.
Part 2 (300 words) In your own words explain how this translates into a practical process that teachers can understand and use (about half a page with no references).
—
Part 1:
Slide 1: Introduction
Introduce the topic of comparing and contrasting the scientific and humanistic approach to evaluation.
Briefly explain the purpose of the presentation.
Slide 2: Scientific Approach
Define the scientific approach and its main characteristics.
Provide examples of evaluation methods that align with the scientific approach, such as standardized testing and quantitative research.
Cite research-based literature that supports the effectiveness of the scientific approach in evaluation.
Slide 3: Humanistic Approach
Define the humanistic approach and its main characteristics.
Provide examples of evaluation methods that align with the humanistic approach, such as self-reflection and qualitative research.
Cite research-based literature that supports the effectiveness of the humanistic approach in evaluation.
References:
Smith, J. (2021). “The Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing.” Journal of Education Research, 14(2), 45-53.
Brown, D. (2020). “Qualitative Research in Education: An Introduction.” Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340707555_Qualitative_Research_in_Education_An_Introduction
Part 2:
The scientific approach to evaluation typically focuses on quantifiable data and objective measurements, such as standardized test scores or numerical research data. This approach is useful for measuring specific skills or knowledge and can provide a clear picture of student performance. On the other hand, the humanistic approach to evaluation focuses on the individual experience and subjective perspectives. This approach is useful for understanding the student’s personal growth, motivation, and self-perception.
In a practical sense, teachers can use a combination of both approaches to get a more comprehensive understanding of student performance. For example, a teacher may use standardized test scores to measure specific knowledge, but also use self-reflection and qualitative assessments to gain insight into the student’s motivation and progress. Additionally, teacher can use the data from both approaches to create a more personalized learning experience for each student.
It is essential for teachers to understand the strengths and limitations of both approaches to evaluation, and be able to use them in a way that benefits the students. They should be able to use the data from both methods to create a more complete picture of the student’s strengths and weaknesses, and to create a more effective learning experience.
