Facial Recognition for Domestic Violence Shelters
Facial recognition technology has the potential to be used as a security measure in domestic violence shelters to help protect victims from their abusers. This could involve installing cameras with facial recognition software at the entrances to the shelters, which would compare the faces of people entering the shelter to a database of known abusers. If a match is found, staff at the shelter could be alerted and take appropriate action to ensure the safety of the victims.
However, there are also potential concerns and limitations to using facial recognition in domestic violence shelters. Research Paper Writing Service: Professional Help in Research Projects for Students – One concern is the accuracy of the technology, as it has been shown to have higher error rates for people with certain characteristics, such as people of color and women. This could lead to false positives, where innocent individuals are wrongly identified as abusers, or false negatives, where known abusers are not detected.
Do My Assignment For Me UK: Class Assignment Help Services Best Essay Writing Experts – Another concern is the impact on the privacy of victims and the potential for abuse of the technology. Domestic violence shelters are meant to be safe, confidential spaces for victims, and the use of facial recognition technology could potentially compromise this confidentiality. There is also the risk that the technology could be hacked or used to track the movements of victims.
The use of facial recognition in domestic violence shelters should be carefully considered, taking into account the potential benefits and risks. It may be appropriate in certain situations, but it should not be the sole security measure and should be used in conjunction with other measures to ensure the safety and privacy of victims.
Facial Recognition Technology
The U.S. Customs and Border Patrol and the TSA are testing the implementation of facial recognition technology at several airports ( facial recognition technology at several airports) and other border crossings (Links to an external site.), and CBP hopes to install face scanners at all US airports within the next 4 years. Some schools are implementing facial recognition (Links to an external site.) on their campuses in an effort to prevent or mitigate schools shootings. Churches have been pitched facial recognition technology (Links to an external site.) as a means to assess attendance, but also to increase security.
You work at a company that develops facial recognition software for various applications; a team member points out that shelters for victims of domestic violence are also organizations greatly concerned with the security of their guests and staff, and might have use for this technology. It could ensure that people entering or approaching the shelter are registered guests or staff there and not unwelcome intruders, and could perhaps aid staff in monitoring and analyzing behavior in the shelter environment.
Should this project be pursued? If not, why not? If so, how could it be done ethically? What unique ethical concerns does it raise?
Please answer the following questions:
Who are the stakeholders involved? Who should be consulted about such a project’s goals and development?
What practical steps might you need to take in order to access the information/perspectives needed to manage the ethical landscape of this project?
What are some other ethical issues that any designers/developers of such an application would need to address?
You can use other resources if necessary. When using sources in your papers, paraphrase/use your own words by providing the link. Do not use quotation marks. This essay must be at least one double-spaced page (250 words) long. This does not include assigned questions and the source information. You must write in organized paragraphs with complete sentences. Do not use bullet points or direct quotes in your analysis.
https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/5/17427150/facial-recognition-vehicle-face-system-homeland-security-immigration-customs
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/07/24/skipping-church-facial-recognition-software-could-be-tracking-you/?noredirect=on
Face Recognition Is Now Being Used in Schools, but It Won’t Stop Mass Shootings
https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/technology-ethics/resources/an-introduction-to-cybersecurity-ethics/
Facial Recognition for Domestic Violence Shelters
A shelter for domestic violence should acquire facial recognition services considering the security benefits offered by the technology. Since the victims are running away from threats to seek refuge, there should be no doubt that increased security measures are essential. Stakeholders such as local government agencies, community groups, donors, and business owners should be involved in the decision making of such an acquisition. Furthermore, the victims, finance team, shelter, and legal management should be consulted to draw goals and development. As much as there may be concerns about facial recognition, ethical measures can help ensure the technology is used for its intended purpose.
Practical steps for the implementation should consider ethical theories to form a landscape that is favorable for the project. A consequentialist approach seems appropriate since the theory focuses on writing a UK dissertation assignment pro papers masters thesis writing – creating a framework that tells right from wrong (Vallor, 2018). The ethical landscape should consider the pros and cons of facial recognition, directly and indirectly affected individuals, as well as the future effects of the systems. Some people may say that facial recognition will soon be regular as it has been adopted in borders, churches, and schools (Brandom, 2018; Bailey, 2015; Kofman, 2018). However, civil-rights activists are busy fighting mass implementations of the technology
Overall, other ethical situations that the developers should consider are the possibilities of individuals using the technology for malicious intent. According to Fox (2017), technology is a good thing, but there are those using it to make the world suffer. The developers must consider security measures that will govern users of the technology, such as passwords and user log records. No policy can protect technology hence the need to implement measures that give humans guidelines.
References
Bailey, S. (2015). Skipping Church? Facial Recognition Software could be Tracking You. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/07/24/skipping-church-facial-recognition-software-could-be-tracking-you/?noredirect=on
Brandom, R. (2018). New Homeland Security System wil bring Facial Recognition to land borders this Summer. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/5/17427150/facial-recognition-vehicle-face-system-homeland-security-immigration-customs
Fox, C. (2017). The Ethical Dilemma we face on AI and autonomous tech. TeDx Talks. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oE88_6jAwc
Kofman, A. (2018). Face Recognition is now neing used in Schoold, but it wont stop Mass Shootings. Retrieved from https://theintercept.com/2018/05/30/face-recognition-schools-school-shootings/
Vallor, S. (2018). A Resource for Cybersecurity Courses. Retrieved from https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/technology-ethics/resources/an-introduction-to-cybersecurity-ethics/
