NURS FPX 4050 Assessment 1 Preliminary Care Coordination Essay

Posted: October 15th, 2024

NURS FPX 4050 Assessment 1 Preliminary Care Coordination

Informatics and Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicators. Hello, my name is –. I am excited to share some insights with you today. The topic of today’s video is patient satisfaction with pain management as a nursing-sensitive quality indicator. This is an important aspect of healthcare that often influences patient outcomes. Nursing-sensitive quality indicators aid in establishing the effectiveness of nursing care given that these indicators mirror distinct characteristics of patients (Oner et al., 2021). By focusing on these indicators, we can better understand the impact of nursing interventions. Patient care experience is also an aspect that falls under this evaluation focus as it mainly deals with pain management. Effective pain management can significantly improve a patient’s overall hospital experience. Therefore, it is beneficial for patients with well-managed pain and their hospital experience will be enhanced. This enhancement not only improves patient satisfaction but also their recovery process. In this tutorial, the reader will learn about the relevance of this indicator how it impacts treatment outcomes and the specifics of enhancing different pain management approaches to meet patients’ needs. Interdisciplinary Team’s Role in Quality Indicator Data Collection and Reporting Data on patient satisfaction with pain management is collected and reported by the interdisciplinary team involved in the patient care process and constitutes a critical element of patient safety, treatment efficacy, and organizational effectiveness (Oner et al., 2021). This collaborative approach ensures a comprehensive view of patient care. Patients’ rating on pain management, checking and recording pain status, and pain relief experience are done directly by nurses working on the ward. Nurses are at the forefront of this data collection due to their constant interaction with patients. Physicians support by evaluating the effectiveness of pain management treatments and adjustment to the treatment plans depending on the patient’s responses and outcomes (Odgaard et al., 2020). Their input is crucial for tailoring treatments to individual patient needs. Pharmacists are also involved in the safe and rational administration of pain drugs since they are knowledgeable of patient reactions to pain medications as well as the side effects (Nantschev et al., 2019). Their expertise helps in preventing adverse drug reactions. Quantitative specialists then integrate the facts and recognize patterns to produce reports. These reports are essential for strategic decision-making. Nurses and physicians document patients’ impressions in EHRs or quality databases; QI personnel analyze the data, and present findings and recommendations. This systematic documentation and analysis are key to continuous improvement. Managers rely on these reports when recommending resource allocation decisions and changes in the policies in a way that the results can translate to positive changes. This technique not only enhances patients’ safety by acknowledging and eradicating weaknesses in the pain management processes but also enhances the patients’ care outcome by applying precise strategies of pain control to those patients (Odgaard et al., 2020). By addressing these weaknesses, healthcare providers can significantly improve patient care. Moreover, the collected data contributes to the information on organizational performance and indicates the effectiveness of interventions to manage pain and support quality improvements. This data-driven approach is vital for maintaining high standards of care. Therefore, in the collaborative ISCM environment, the role of the interdisciplinary team in data reporting and gathering is indispensable to enhance patient care and organizational performance. Their collective efforts ensure that patient care is both effective and efficient. Nursing-Sensitive Indicators in Enhancing Patient Safety and Outcomes Nursing-sensitive quality indicators include patient satisfaction with pain management, which can be employed by healthcare organizations to enhance patient safety, and treatment outcomes, as well as organizational performance reports (Asamrew et al., 2020). These indicators serve as a compass for improving healthcare delivery. These indicators offer significant data and understanding of areas that need to be strengthened, including an improved approach to pain management that could potentially harm patients. Identifying these areas is the first step towards better patient outcomes. Patient feedback can be tracked systematically to identify concerns, modify relevant protocols, and implement palliative measures to ensure effective pain management and prevent adverse effects or complications. Nursing-sensitive quality indicators are directly related to patient care outcomes since they identify areas of strength or concern (Odgaard et al., 2020). This direct relationship underscores the importance of these indicators in clinical practice. Monitoring the patient’s experience in terms of pain control and its reduction allows healthcare providers to adjust the pain relief approaches depending on individual patients’ needs or preferences. Personalized care plans can then be developed to meet these needs. It enhances efficacy in handling pain, patient comfort, and satisfaction with the care which in turn enhances health outcomes as well as the quality of treatments. Moreover, these indicators are useful when evaluating organizational performance since they present the facts the experiences of patients, and figures on the quality of nursing care. They provide a measurable way to assess the effectiveness of care delivery. Indicators like patient satisfaction with pain management help enterprise evaluate their efficiency and compliance with the quality indicators (Danilov et al., 2020). This evaluation is crucial for strategic planning and resource allocation. This information is used in decision-making for planning and directing resources as well as the formation of policies that create constant enhancements in the delivery of care and efficiency in organizations. Continuous improvement is thus facilitated by these indicators. Moreover, nursing-centered measures of care quality are instrumental for patient protection, delivering optimal results, and creating a multifaceted statement of performance that facilitates effective functioning. Nursing-Sensitive Indicators Guiding Technology Use A key nursing-sensitive quality measure, such as patient satisfaction with pain management, can be useful in creating practice guidelines for nurses who utilize patient care technologies (Cascella et al., 2022). These guidelines ensure that technology is used in a way that benefits patient care. This indicator is used as a benchmark in assessing the effectiveness of pain management therapies and in determining the changes that are needed. Benchmarking helps in setting standards for care delivery. Utilizing data on patient satisfaction, benchmarking policies can be created to ensure that the technologies and practices adopted meet or exceed what patients expect. For instance, when evidence reveals dissatisfaction with pain management, failure to receive adequate pain management using modern technologies promotes a reconsideration of current practices and leads to the production of guidelines that determine the effective and efficient use of technology in compliance with best practices (Danilov et al., 2020). This reassessment is essential for adapting to patient needs. Implementation of this data into practice guidelines enhances the safety of patients by dealing with technological challenges, while research-based enhancements boost safety and effectiveness. Moreover, guidelines based on such indications help manage patients’ concerns and foster satisfaction and outcomes as pain management is adjusted to his/her patient (Cascella et al., 2022). Customizing care based on these guidelines can significantly improve patient satisfaction. Therefore, the nursing-sensitive quality indicators convey an important function and work towards identifying the processes that will ensure technology is adhered to safely and optimally to cause enhanced patient care. Conclusion Accurate documentation and reporting of patients’ perception of pain management services is essential for the improvement of the delivery of patient care and safety (Valentine et al., 2021). This documentation forms the backbone of quality improvement initiatives. This indicator is used for the assessment of the efficiency of pain management and the guidance of evidence-based practice and patient care. By focusing on this, healthcare can move towards more personalized and effective treatments. Perhaps, by gathering the information in time and with maximum accuracy, you can contribute to identifying the gaps, improving the methods of pain management, and ensuring compliance with patients’ requirements. Timely and accurate data collection is thus crucial. In this tutorial, we’ll delve into the importance of this indicator, explore its impact on patient care, and discuss practical approaches to improving pain management practices to better meet patient needs.

References
Adu, P., Jurcik, T., & Dmitry, G. (2021). Mental health literacy in Ghana: Implications for religiosity, education and stigmatization. Transcultural Psychiatry, 58(4), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634615211022177

Kruis, T., Menzel, P., Schwarzer, R., Wiesener, S., Schoenrath, F., Klefisch, F., Stegemann, M., & Pfäfflin, F. (2023). Outbreak of pandoraea commovens infections among non-cystic fibrosis intensive care patients, Germany, 2019-2021. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 29(11), 2229–2237. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2911.230493

Liu, C., Wang, D., Liu, C., Jiang, J., Wang, X., Chen, H., Ju, X., & Zhang, X. (2020). What is the meaning of health literacy? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Family Medicine and Community Health, 8(2), e000351. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2020-000351

Livingood, W. C., Bautista, M. A. B., Smotherman, C., Azueta, D., Coleman, J., Grewal, R., Stewart, E., Orlando, L. A., & Scuderi, C. (2022). Comparative study of different SES neighborhood clinics for health literacy and internet access. Digital Health, 8, 20552076221123715. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221123715

Mirczak A. (2022). Functional, communicative and critical health literacy among older Polish citizens. Medycyna Pracy, 73(3), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.01250

Rueda-Medina, B., Gómez-Urquiza, J. L., Casas-Barragán, A., Toledano-Moreno, S., Aguilar-Ferrándiz, M. E., & Correa-Rodríguez, M. (2023). eHealth literacy, internet use and health-related behaviour among health sciences students: a cross-sectional study. Contemporary Nurse, 59(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2023.2166547

Serchen, J., Doherty, R., Atiq, O., Hilden, D., & Health and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians (2021). A comprehensive policy framework to understand and address disparities and discrimination in health and health care: A policy paper from the American college of physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine, 174(4), 529–532. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-7219

Yoon, J., Lee, M., Ahn, J. S., Oh, D., Shin, S. Y., Chang, Y. J., & Cho, J. (2022). Development and validation of digital health technology literacy assessment questionnaire. Journal of Medical Systems, 46(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01800-8