There’s a Reason Trump Could Try to Overturn the Results of the 2020 Election
In 2 pages, write in response to the article
” There’s a Reason Trump Could try to overturn the results of the 2020 Election”
1. identify the yes or no composition? (what is the actual statement of the article)
2. identify specific arguments or reasonings given in the article.
3. access each reasoning for its strengths, type, and truth. ( is it a true statement?)
4. consider counter arguments
5. what good arguments did the author fail to use?
6. write Any other observations to do with argumentation.
Donald Trump, the former President of the United States, made claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election, which he lost to President Joe Biden. He and his supporters made numerous attempts to overturn the results, including filing lawsuits and pressuring state officials. Despite these efforts, multiple courts, including the Supreme Court, rejected these claims, finding no evidence of widespread fraud.
The arguments made by Trump and his supporters mainly revolved around alleged irregularities and fraud, such as claims of late-arriving ballots, malfunctioning machines, and illegal voting. However, these claims were thoroughly investigated and found to be unsubstantiated.
Strengths of these arguments can include that they were made by a former President and a significant portion of his supporters, giving them a level of credibility. However, the type of reasoning used was mainly anecdotal and lacked concrete evidence to support the claims of widespread fraud. The truth of these arguments is questionable as they have been discredited by multiple court rulings.
Counter-arguments to these claims include that the election was one of the most secure in US history, with multiple independent agencies and courts finding no evidence of widespread fraud. Additionally, the claims made by Trump and his supporters were often based on misinformation and conspiracy theories.
The author of the article could have used stronger arguments, such as the lack of concrete evidence to support the claims of fraud and the findings of multiple independent agencies and courts that the election was secure.
In conclusion, the arguments made by Trump and his supporters to overturn the results of the 2020 election were largely unfounded and lacked concrete evidence. The reasoning used was mainly anecdotal and based on misinformation, and the claims were rejected by multiple courts.